Note: Please don’t make lists — comments that contain more than one suggestion will not be considered. If you’d like to suggest more, please use the one-comment-one vehicle rule using the template below. You can leave more than one comment in this thread, there’s no limit to this.
Same pen, Same reload, Tiger 105 has 2x HE filler, 105 has slightly better power to weight, Better hull armor, Range finder and the mantlet for the gun covers a larger area making the penable spot on the face smaller than the normal one, The only advantage the T29 has over it is .50’s and a slightly more trolly mantlet if shooting the edges of it.
BMP-2 can’t fire on the move and it’s missile drops when launched by quite a bit.
BMP-3 needs 26s to reload it’s ATGM and that’s kind of a lot.
All of them fire APDS at 82mm of pen.
There’re no BMPs with 6 crew.
I doubt a hit like that would kill a Bradley or something like that. You barely missed the track.
The M60A1 AOS has the benefit of an optical rangefinder, something the T-62 lacks. They have comparable mobility and armour. Yes, 3BM3 and 3BM4 both beat M728 in flat pen, but 3BM4 has poorer ricochet angles and the “upgraded” 3BM3 has less 60° pen. The T-62 has a slower reload also.
I don’t see any fundamental imbalance with them being at the same BR. If the Object 140 and Vickers Mk. 3 can both sit at 8.3, I don’t see how the T-62 would somehow be too powerful there.
ARB/GRB BI 6.7 > 7.3
ridiculously fast, while maintaining decent mobility and powerful guns. Its low fuel load is not really a problem because consumption drops very quickly when throttle is lowered.