Just like KF41 and Puma VJTF,
Like hell, even the Freccia with 10 Spikes is only just 10.3
M247 9.0-9.3
The most dangerous SPAA at this BR, after getting ammo box, it could kill everything from 8.0-10.0, especially at this range most of CAS planes don’t have good RWR or even don’t have RWR, it can easily kill a heli far from 3.5-4km, so move to 9.3 match most of heli’s missile shoot range
I agree. It can be a special case like some other TDs with scouting like the asu-57 or the m56.
G8N1 need to stay where it is . G8 will be unplayable versus jets.
2 Likes
M26 6.7-6.3, considering we have M26E1,M26E5,M26E1A1 at the same BR, it is not a good idea to make it at the same BR, it’s like make T44-100 and T44 stay at the same BR
1 Like
Needing airspawn for SO4050 like il28
1 Like
Alpha (only French one)
GRB 9.0-8.7, no flares and powerful gun(BK27) for CAS, it can be considered movING to 8.7
2 Likes
Mig 21 and AJ37 from 10.7 to 10.3.
It is, in my opinion, a bad idea, in 9.3-9.7 there are many planes without countermeasures, they only depend on their speed or turn rate, you will insert some of the fastest planes in the game with AAM and flares/chaff, this will ruin the balance of the game you have at the moment. Any Mig 21 can be handled in its BR.
Maybe you should fix the MM so that a plane/player doesn’t always have games with higher levels.
When I’m in reading comprehension competition and my opponent is WT community
1 Like
ARB, mig-17_cuba. 9.0 > 8.8. For a long time it and the standard MiG-17 were both the same BR. However, somewhat recently the MiG-17 (and many others) were moved down a BR step. The MiG-17AS (mig-17_cuba) remained untouched.
1 Like
Yeah, a 3.7 medium. Still more mobile and fast that many of its enemys.
Mode : Air RB,
Vehicle name : Jaguar E
Change request : 10.7 > 9.7/10.0.
Reason : Almost the same armament as the Harrier (BR 9.7),
much less acceleration than the Mig21SMT & J35XS (BR 10.3),
less mobility than the Harrier (BR 9.7), No RWR!
5 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT can we exspect to see the first changes on the taple under influence of Community feedback?
Mode : Air RB,
Vehicle name : Jaguar A
Change request : 10.7 > 9.7/10.0.
Reason : Almost the same armament as the Harrier (BR 9.7),
much less acceleration than the Mig21SMT & J35XS (BR 10.3),
less mobility than the Harrier (BR 9.7)
7 Likes
Its already extremely difficult to argue that the tiger 2s shouldn’t go to 7.0, I don’t think that a vehicles BR should be effected by player-base knowledge of the most common vehicle at that BRs weak-spots, also we’ve already done the 6.3 tiger 2 experiment and it was absurd and illogical. I think leaving the tiger 2 P at 6.7 and the tiger 2 H 7.0 makes some sense, as the turret is tangibly weaker, but even still right now all of the tiger 2 88mms are considered by many to be the best tank at the BR. absolutely no room to lower the BR.
Ground RB, Ka-29, 9.7 → 9.3 - comparing it to the Mi-24V/P, it has no AAMs at all, while they both carry the same amount of Shturm ATGMs. It only has slightly (10x vs 15x) better gunner zoom, but that barely helps. Also has absolutely no RWR at all. The Mi-24V/P has SPO-10, this has none.
Once all the feedback has been collected and sent to the developers for review, we close the topic as always and answer as such. After some time to review all of it, the final changes are usually posted a few days - week later.
1 Like
Air Realistic Battles, MiG-23ML. 11.7 > 11.3. The MiG-23ML currently holds a BR of 11.7. However, several reasons suggest that a downgrade to 11.3 might be appropriate:
• Radar Limitations: Players have reported that the MiG-23ML’s radar is suboptimal, often struggling to maintain locks and being susceptible to chaff interference. This unreliability hampers the effectiveness of its radar-guided missiles.
• Missile Constraints: The aircraft is equipped with R-24R missiles, which, while potent, are limited to two per loadout. In contrast, comparable aircraft like the F-4E Phantom II (which is at 11.3) can carry up to four AIM-7E-2 missiles, providing greater engagement flexibility.
• Flight Performance: Recent adjustments have reportedly affected the MiG-23ML’s flight model, leading to decreased maneuverability and energy retention. This makes it more challenging to compete against other top-tier aircraft.
• Countermeasure Limitations: The MiG-23ML’s countermeasure suite is less effective compared to some adversaries, making it more vulnerable to advanced missile threats.
dude it was a joke
@Smin1080p_WT Good evening; has there been any consideration at all about decreasing the Mi-8AMTSh-vn for GRB? at 11.0 you already have the Mi-28N; which is better by a fair margin; and it brings barely anything over the Mi-35 at 10.7 even! i get it that AESA radar is an interesting gimmick, but provides barely anything to the gameplay; not to mention that the “Verba” A2A is not enough of an upgrade over the “Igla”, plus you’re missing on 4 atakas for those A2A missiles, leaving you with only 4 ATGMs? thanks a lot