For Stormer AD, it doesn’t show better performance comparing to Gepard1A2.
For SIDAM, absence of radar and shortrange of cannon make it work no better than Machbet(Israel).
For PGZ04A and ZSU-23-4M4, clearly the introducing of ammo box make them obtain better performance, should be at the same BR with Gepard1A2.
For Ozelot, doesn’t show the same performance like Gepard1A2 in 9.7, its absence of cannon make it unable to handle close targets. And the introducing of ammo box make its ammo load advantage no more.
Namer Tsrikhon 11.0 → 11.3??? Why??? It can’t even hit targets that are less than ~300 meters away, only has 4 unreliable Spikes, has all the ammo it the turret, has no armor and is slow as hell! It should be 11.0 → 10.7!
GRB, E.B.R. (1951) 5.3 → 5.0, the cannon is too weak for that BR, you don’t have armor to compensate it, the only thing it has is mobility, but you can, for example, bring German Sd.Kfz. 234/2 or 234/4 (Puma) to the same BR and it will do the same if not better.
M247 9.0-9.3
The most dangerous SPAA at this BR, after getting ammo box, it could kill everything from 8.0-10.0, especially at this range most of CAS planes don’t have good RWR or even don’t have RWR, it can easily kill a heli far from 3.5-4km, so move to 9.3 match most of heli’s missile shoot range
M26 6.7-6.3, considering we have M26E1,M26E5,M26E1A1 at the same BR, it is not a good idea to make it at the same BR, it’s like make T44-100 and T44 stay at the same BR
Mig 21 and AJ37 from 10.7 to 10.3.
It is, in my opinion, a bad idea, in 9.3-9.7 there are many planes without countermeasures, they only depend on their speed or turn rate, you will insert some of the fastest planes in the game with AAM and flares/chaff, this will ruin the balance of the game you have at the moment. Any Mig 21 can be handled in its BR.
Maybe you should fix the MM so that a plane/player doesn’t always have games with higher levels.
ARB, mig-17_cuba. 9.0 > 8.8. For a long time it and the standard MiG-17 were both the same BR. However, somewhat recently the MiG-17 (and many others) were moved down a BR step. The MiG-17AS (mig-17_cuba) remained untouched.
Mode : Air RB,
Vehicle name : Jaguar E
Change request : 10.7 > 9.7/10.0.
Reason : Almost the same armament as the Harrier (BR 9.7),
much less acceleration than the Mig21SMT & J35XS (BR 10.3),
less mobility than the Harrier (BR 9.7), No RWR!
Mode : Air RB,
Vehicle name : Jaguar A
Change request : 10.7 > 9.7/10.0.
Reason : Almost the same armament as the Harrier (BR 9.7),
much less acceleration than the Mig21SMT & J35XS (BR 10.3),
less mobility than the Harrier (BR 9.7)
Its already extremely difficult to argue that the tiger 2s shouldn’t go to 7.0, I don’t think that a vehicles BR should be effected by player-base knowledge of the most common vehicle at that BRs weak-spots, also we’ve already done the 6.3 tiger 2 experiment and it was absurd and illogical. I think leaving the tiger 2 P at 6.7 and the tiger 2 H 7.0 makes some sense, as the turret is tangibly weaker, but even still right now all of the tiger 2 88mms are considered by many to be the best tank at the BR. absolutely no room to lower the BR.
Ground RB, Ka-29, 9.7 → 9.3 - comparing it to the Mi-24V/P, it has no AAMs at all, while they both carry the same amount of Shturm ATGMs. It only has slightly (10x vs 15x) better gunner zoom, but that barely helps. Also has absolutely no RWR at all. The Mi-24V/P has SPO-10, this has none.