GRB, F16a from France. 12.0 > 12.3. Having Aim9m and AGM`s compared to other Fighter with similar Performance Like F16a from USA or Japan.
1 Like
Air RB, J-11A, 13.7 > 13.3.
J-11A is not of the same performance as the Su27SM at 13.7. The RWR is still SPO-15, which sucks, and the thrust to weight ratio is slightly lower too. Compared to the Mig29SMT at 13.3, the J-11A has better flight performace and carries more missiles, while the radar is worse.
7 Likes
Air RB:
South African Gripen 13.7 - > 13.3
This aircraft carries the same maximum amount and types of missiles that the JF-17 does. While it is more maneuverable and has more CM. It’s Fox-1 missiles are significantly worse than the JF-17’s
mmmyes. the atlanta, which was the bane of so much destroyers, now becomes the iranian f-14 of naval. once a beneficiary of br compression, now a victim of it. what will it do against the iron duke? pelt it with rocks?
1 Like
rightfully deseved when it blatantly chips away British CA crew bc gaijin places all of them in unarmored compartments, thats what they get for not obeying the treaty
1 Like
true tho
I am going to however keep insisting that most 5.7 British ships do need a drop, they are still inferior to the atlanta
2 Likes
Atlanta needed to go up, no question of it
1 Like
Naval daily lmao, even face with 6.0 cruisers Atlanta can’t do anything
J35A at 9.3 seems a bit excessive, 8.3s have no chance against it in terms of flight performance.
Ayit can be moved up to 9.7. I always found it comparable to AV-8A/C with the upgraded engine power it has.
1 Like
Yeh, I linked it because it’s good :-) Hope Gaijin notices and acts upon it!
If they do some decompression for the capital ships, cruisers and below can follow later.
Should have notified you though, sorry for that!
F-4C needs to go down in sim as well. It currently sits at the same br as F-4E which has better sparrows, better sidewinders, flares, leading edge slats, more powerful engines and a fuselage mounted cannon. There’s no reason to use F-4C in sim currently
2 Likes
I think its a good idea to lower the br of all r2y2s
They are just over br ed right now
3 Likes
As with the Hunter: return them both to their glory days
i have a suggestion for you to make with your fancy words, look at the BR changes, look at the canberras, see the issue? go morvan go!
Its hilarious to me that the r3 in total went from 3.7 to 5.7 and leopard 40/70 went in total from 5.0 to 6.0. Amx 10p going in total of 5.0 to 6.3 is hilarious as well. Don’t get me wrong its funny to kill tigers and panthers with a 40mm cannon strapped to a leopard chassis but i Dont think its 6.0 good, definitely never going to be used as an spaa at that br lol
Neither do you if you think an A-10C at 11.7 is sane.
A-10C 11.7 → 12.0
A good few of the Sweden tank 1 tanks are from 1960 my guy. Does that mean they should all be 8.7 for your idea of historical matchmaking?
Mode : Air RB
Vehicle name : Mirage F1C/ F1C(200)
Change request : 12.0 > 12.3
Reason : Powerful IRCCM missile “magic2”,
(now Matra530F is not so bad)
better speed and acceleration compared to F4J/S (BR 12.0),
extremely high winning rate (around 70% ※)
※source : WT Data Project
2 Likes