all mode 10.7→11.0
leopard 2a4 ALL should get DM33 and go 11.0
Some of the heavy bomber reductions are just not enough to make a difference.
Lancaster for example, could easily be 4.3 given its incredibly weak defensive turrets. But that requires bringing heavy bombers onto Split BRs.
1 Like
ARB, F-15A (USA). 13.0>13.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an F-15A.
3 Likes
j_7d
should remove PL5B and stay 10.7
too bad in 11.0 and too strong in 10.7 just remove the PL5B
3 Likes
ARB, Su-27 (Russia). 13.0>13.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an Su-27.
1 Like
I so hope for them to finally add AIM-9L to FGR.2
2 Likes
As do we all
1 Like
ARB, F-14B (USA). 13.0>13.3; receive AIM-9M
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an F-14B. To accommodate its higher BR, it should receive AIM-9Ms.
1 Like
BOL Overhaul would help too. If the 640 BOL CMs were actually strong, then it would help it a lot with the higher BR
1 Like
ARB, F-14A Early (USA). 12.7>13.0; receive AIM-9L.
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be regularly facing off against an F-14A. To accommodate its higher BR, it should receive AIM-9Ls.
1 Like
Better RWR, ALOT more CM’s, better Fox-2’s, better engine (IRIAF can’t even outrun most of its contemporaries), R27R is only slightly better, really slightly.
ARB, F-16 ADF (USA). 12.7>13.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be regularly facing off against an F-16 ADF.
1 Like
Imagine properly roleplaying Falklands in sim with FGR.2 and Sea Harrier, both with limas slinging all aspects. Now add to that (holy cope) Skyflash with its proper low altitude performance…
1 Like
Air RB, J-11 (China). 13.0>13.3.
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an J-11.
1 Like
Air rb & air sim
mig29A’s (existing 12.7br mig29 9.12 & 9.13’s)
Change - weaponry (add r73 & remove ER)
For most of the time since release mig29’s have been in a troubled state of balance primarily due to the introduction of the ER. Now we all know the very poor dynamics the ER has caused around these lower br’s, and since the introduction of mig29 many aircraft have since received their high performance IRCCM fox2’s yet the mig29 still is missing its flagship missile - the r73 - and suffers still with the monumentally terrible r60m which is arguably the worse fox2 all the way down to like 11.3. This is basically the same equivalent of adding a tomcat without its phoenix’s and it’s a travesty it’s still allowed to happen. The removal of the ER & addition of the r73’s not only would be a proper historical representation of these aircraft but also offer a much better-balanced feel for the jets. If further balance would be needed in the future then utilise br as the balancing measure instead of arbitrarily removing quintessential kit from the aircraft, and if the devs are set on having an r60 limited mig29 to fill br gaps then consider introducing a 9.12 for russia at 12.3 limited to r60m & non extended range r27’s which would be a more appropriate way to accomplish such a thing.
6 Likes
Air RB, Su-33 (Russia). 13.0>13.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an Su-33.
1 Like
Im still waiting for EEGS and a proper HUD for the SHars at a bare minimum for that. Let alone the dozen or so other bugs and issues on all the Harriers getting addressed. Like the FRS1e right now is barely 10.7 worthy, at full strength, it could end up at 11.0. quite easily. IRL it readily beat both the F-5E (in 1v1 combat) and F-15A (in 2v2 combat).
1 Like
Air RB, F-16 ADF (Italy). 12.7>13.0.
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments- including this one.
1 Like
suggest
Tornado IDS ASSTA 11.7→11.3(AR) because it’s basic same plane like Tornado WTD61 in AR.
JH7A 12.3→12.0（AR）for it’s lacking anti flare fox2.
M2K D-RMV 12.7→12.0（AR）for it’s lacking fox1 or mica-em.
OSA 10.3→10.7 （GR）for it’s extremely long range missile compare to Roland 3
VT4 12.0→11.7（GR）for it’s lack Armor and speed compare to ztz99a.Or just increase it’s engine power to1500hp.
A-10C 12.0→11.3（GR）for it’s have no fighting chance against Pantsir. should just keep its br a little higher than Tor-M1.
Tornado IDS ASSTA 11.3→10.7（GR）for lacking fire and forget PGM bomb. Same BR change shall apply for Italian Tornado IDS.
Jaguar IS 11.3→10.7(GR) because similar CAS ability compare to Jaguar GR1. Just some inefficient laser guide bomb.
4 Likes
Air RB, F-16A MLU Block 20 (China). 12.7>13.0.
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments- including this one.