Planned Battle Rating Changes for February 2025

ARB, MiG-21MF (Italy). STAY @ 10.7

This aircraft’s capabilities, armaments, and performance are perfectly suited to 10.7, and reducing its BR only further compresses the 9.3-10.3 BR Bracket, which would frustrate players and be unhealthy for the game. Do not reduce its BR.

3 Likes

The Pbv 301 the 1.3 or 1.7 is from the 1960s so should it be 8.7 then?

we need higher BRs for planes in GRB

1 Like

Do you have the Mi-24D or a?

Air RB, F-16A (USA). STAY @ 12.7.

This aircraft is very capable and should not be reduced in BR. Its only disadvantage is its lack of BVR capability, but that should not justify dropping it in BR so it can wreak havoc on aircraft as low as 11.3 in BR, which have very little hope of contesting it. Other solutions, such as broader BR decompression from 12.7 upwards, should be pursued.

Do not reduce the BR of this aircraft.

4 Likes

all mode 10.3→9.7
cn_antelope_tc_1l_ads
it should have a lower BR then il_mim_72 while cn_antelope_tc_1l_ads have a less and worse missile can only shoot at 3km

1 Like

AAM-3 would be the Aim-9M Equivalent.

AAM-4 is the AMRAAM equivalent.

2 Likes

Why the list so short? Are this unfinished?

all mode 10.7→11.0
leopard 2a4 ALL should get DM33 and go 11.0

Some of the heavy bomber reductions are just not enough to make a difference.

Lancaster for example, could easily be 4.3 given its incredibly weak defensive turrets. But that requires bringing heavy bombers onto Split BRs.

1 Like

ARB, F-15A (USA). 13.0>13.3

BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an F-15A.

3 Likes

j_7d
should remove PL5B and stay 10.7
too bad in 11.0 and too strong in 10.7 just remove the PL5B

3 Likes

ARB, Su-27 (Russia). 13.0>13.3

BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an Su-27.

1 Like

I so hope for them to finally add AIM-9L to FGR.2

2 Likes

As do we all

1 Like

ARB, F-14B (USA). 13.0>13.3; receive AIM-9M

BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be facing off against an F-14B. To accommodate its higher BR, it should receive AIM-9Ms.

1 Like

BOL Overhaul would help too. If the 640 BOL CMs were actually strong, then it would help it a lot with the higher BR

1 Like

ARB, F-14A Early (USA). 12.7>13.0; receive AIM-9L.

BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be regularly facing off against an F-14A. To accommodate its higher BR, it should receive AIM-9Ls.

1 Like

Better RWR, ALOT more CM’s, better Fox-2’s, better engine (IRIAF can’t even outrun most of its contemporaries), R27R is only slightly better, really slightly.

ARB, F-16 ADF (USA). 12.7>13.0

BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. No 12.0 aircraft currently in game should be regularly facing off against an F-16 ADF.

1 Like