Vehicle: F-16A OCU (Thailand F-16)
Gamemode: Air RB
BR Change:13.7 —> 13.3
Reason: lack of HMD/HMS, weak engine(F-16A engine), lack of Flares/Chaff(only 15+30), don’t have MAWS(Not like the F-16AM [Belgium]), max 6 AAM Slot
6 Likes
Increase the ground BR to 14.0 please…
The compression is painful.
F7F-1
Mode: Air Realistic
BR: 6.3 > 6.0
F7F is outclassed by comparable aircraft like the Ki-83 and Hornet. Both of these superior aircraft are 0.3 BR lower. The F7F-1 should be placed at the same BR. It would still have inferior performance, but its ground ordnance would justify sharing the 6.0 BR.
3 Likes
6 fakours may be stretching it unless you’re moving it up to 13.3, that way it’d be a bit more balanced (not fully) against aircraft with R-77s and Aim-120As, it would be very interesting to see how it performs against Rafales, F-15Es and the Eurofighters that have much better missiles, radar and flight performance
RB F-20A 12.7 → 13.0 - give AIM-120 x2 as a loadout option.
Reasoning: the Premium Viggen has proven that these are not a problem gameplay wise. It was fitted with everything to use the 120’s and was planned to, which is the same justification used for the Yak-141.
F-80C is fine at 7.7. The problem is all of the Sabres and MiGs that were dropped too low.
Previously, this thing could only see MiG-15bis & F-86F-30 in a full uptier. Now it can see a MiG-17PF. That is absolutely ridiculous.
Problem with the F-20 is that it gets immediatelly outclassed by the F16 however with 2 fox-3 missiles, it should be somewhat more worth using it especially with its amazing flight model but yeah I agree, F-20 does need some sort of buff to help it compete against F-16s and other top tier aircraft but 13.0 means you’d face eurofighters and rafales
Not only sabre, mig15, The F80C is too slow and the mobility is not the best, I am even sure that it will can against sea Meteor and SU11, which are 7.3
Air RB:
Yak-141 12.7 → 13.0 - give R-73 and R-77 options.
This would help add 13.0 lineup variety to russia.
And it has neither flares, a gun or is supersonic.
1 Like
That’s not stretching it whatsoever. That should be standard. Fakours aren’t Aim-120s. They’re worse.
1 Like
R-73 would be fine at 12.7 but the R-77 would make it 13.3.
If the F-20 were to get Aim-120s, it would get a double rack of them in place of the Sparrows. So 4x Aim-120.
Any battle rating changes that don’t include a BR increase for Top Tier is just moving around compression and compression is bad, m-kay.
4 Likes
It would perform terribly. I don’t understand why it needs to go up. Throwing it against 14.0 effectively mitigates the one thing people seem to be upset about. The EFT and company along with the F-15E can out climb it, have better missiles, better radar, better RWRs, etcs. Its going to be forced to belly crawl, negating the Fakours completely. Which I imagine would justify dropping it again. The missiles it has can be easily defeated. I feel like the only people wanting it to go up are the ones pissed it didnt go to like Russia or China for some odd reason.
AMX-32 105 9.3 > 9.0
AMX-32 105 9.3 > 9.3 Buff the reload
It shouldn’t stay at the same BR as AMX-32 120 that has better gun and engine
2 Likes
M2000D-RMV ARB 12.7-12.0
M2000D-R1 ARB 12.3-12.0
They have only 2 IRAAM and no gun. They CAN NOT fit the 12.7 air fight.
3 Likes
JH-7A Air RB 12.3→11.3/11.7
it doesn’t have Fox1 or irccm missiles, and the Kh29T only has two. Only has extremely low combat capability in the 12.3 weight. And JH7A doesn’t have a gun aiming point，The body performance is only similar to F4
Or add 4 pl5e2 weights to keep them unchanged
8 Likes
ZSL92 6.3-7.3 Add APDS
ZSL92 is not good as a SPAA, due to the very long reload time, it should be consider as BTR-80
4 Likes
Based.