I’m talking about KPz-70 exclusively, as it’s the best out of the three.
You’re going to use the same weakspots to T-72A, T-72B, T-80B, etc. so this is a moot point.
KPz-70 is the best 9.3 MBT, so moving it down would move everything else down.
You meant 34 CM’s
1 Like
R2Y2, All variants, RB: 8.0 → 7.3. Plane has long since been nerfed, to have to face 9.0 planes in this is insanity. I do not want these forgotten about and left where they are for eternity.
5 Likes
Su-22M3 isn’t even supersonic with it’s bomb load, so it was far from fastest at 11.3. Not to mention that 6 pops of flares is simply not enough.
1 Like
I don’t need any experience with it to say that. You don’t have arms, legs, or a head.
Since the BR changes of December 2023? What do you even mean?
Instead of moving IPM1 down, M1A1 should lose it’s reload speed.
M1A1 having 5s reload while Merkavas having 6s is beyond me.
1 Like
Playing MiG-29 with R-60s against Eurofighters and Rafales is insane
2 Likes
it seems
American provide extra protein and steroids on MRE for loader
Israel doesn’t.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
3 Likes
Do not delude yourself into thinking their mobility is at all comparable. The T18E2 is the size of a barn and has a meager 10.4 hp/t compared to the very impressive 17.9 hp/ton of the Puma. The T18E2 is too fat to properly play the role of a light tank and ends up feeling more like a medium. The Puma on the other hand is easily the fastest vehicle at that BR.
The T18E2 is a good matchup for some of the mainstays of 3.3. The T-34 (1940) has much better offroad mobility in a smaller package with significantly better armor than the T18E2, but has a gun that is overall harder to use and loses the scouting bonus. The M4A1 has better armor, a more punchy gun, and a .50 cal, but is overall less mobile and doesn’t get scouting. The T18E2 would definitely be strong at 3.3, but I do not think it would be out of place either. At 3.7, I feel the T18E2 would fall apart once it needs to start competing directly with the M24 Chaffee.
Anyone trying to compare the T18E2 and Sd.Kfz. 234/2 apples to apples is someone who has not played both of them. One of these vehicles sacrifices armor and firepower for unrivaled mobility while the other is a medium on wheels LARPing as a light.
Due to their launching mechanism, they’ll have a lot of issues dealing with targets in close ranges.
Type 81 is definitely better against aircraft than them, unless you wanna shoot at something 12/15km away which you aren’t hitting anyways.
Hello,
I would like to raise the issue of reconsidering the battle rating of the new Mi-8AMTSh-VN helicopter and its inclusion in the 10_2 simulator battle setup. Currently, the helicopter’s BR is clearly overestimated, especially when compared to its counterparts.
The Mi-8AMTSh-VN can be directly compared to the Mi-35M, which has a BR of 10.7 but is already included in the 10_2 SB lineup. However, the Mi-8AMTSh-VN is objectively inferior to the Mi-35M in several aspects:
1. Armament
The Mi-35M can carry 4 9M39 air-to-air missiles and 8 Ataka ATGMs simultaneously, whereas the Mi-8AMTSh-VN cannot equip both 8 Ataka ATGMs and air-to-air missiles at the same time, significantly reducing its combat effectiveness against both aircraft and ground targets.
Mi-8AMTSH-VN
MI-35M
The Mi-35M has access to S-13OF heavy unguided rockets, while the Mi-8AMTSh-VN lacks this option.
Additionally, the Mi-35M features a chin-mounted autocannon turret, which provides superior firepower. The Mi-8AMTSh-VN does not have such a turret.
2. Targeting System
The Mi-35M has a better zoom capability (3.7x–73.7x), making it more effective for engaging targets at long distances. In comparison, the Mi-8AMTSh-VN has a more limited zoom (12.3x–67.0x), making precise long-range shooting more difficult.
3. Mobility
The Mi-35M is more maneuverable and accelerates faster, making it less vulnerable to enemy SAMs and aircraft. In contrast, the Mi-8AMTSh-VN is bulkier and less agile, making it an easier target for enemy attacks.
The only notable advantage of the Mi-8AMTSh-VN over the Mi-35M is the presence of an IRCM system and radar. However, these features do not compensate for its numerous disadvantages. The radar, while present, has very limited usage, and most players do not even use it.
Reducing the BR to 10.7 and including the Mi-8AMTSh-VN in the 10_2 SB setup would make this helicopter more viable and balanced. Players would gain access to a unique vehicle that can compete at its level without disrupting game balance.
Assigning a BR of 11.0 and placing it in the 11_2 SB setup just because of its IRCM and radar (which is rarely used) is unfair. The helicopter is otherwise inferior in terms of performance and weaponry compared to aircraft with lower BRs, not to mention those at its own BR.
I urge players to support this proposal, and I kindly request the developers to consider implementing these changes.
4 Likes
Air simulator battle, Su-27/J-11 13.3 > 13.0
It’s complicated to face off the 14.0 plane with them
It needs WAY more than Aim-9M to see 13.3. They need to unnerf the Aim-54Cs, make the TCS function how it’s supposed to, and unnerf the engines.
Air Simulator Battles, Mirage F1C, 11.7 > 12.0
At 11.7, the armament of the Mirage F1 is significantly better than opposing fighters. Magic 2s become functionally impossible to flare once they’re within about 1500-2000m, and the MTI capability of the radar makes it capable of look-down shots that almost no other planes have until 12.0. While it is inferior to many other planes in a dogfight, it has much better capability to not just win before the merge, but to be un-counterable before the merge.
1 Like
Anybody who wants the Magic 2 at an even lower BR while the IRIAF has to go to 13.0 with Aim-9Ps has 0 sympathy from me. No.
2 Likes
The cv 90 mk iv must go down in rank.
Chat GPThunder moment
Just as a note, most AIs were pretty dumb when it comes to video games. ChatGPT does not know that MiG-29s were in the game, while someone fiddeling with deepseek found out the game has the KV-8(it doesnt).
F-20 and every other F-16A (Except ones with AIM-9M or AIM-120) then should go down too.
I actually tested it for AI and it came at zero.
1 Like