M1A1
11.3–>11.3
Remove 5 second reload: The 5 second reload on this abrams makes the IPM1 all but useless since it has the same reload and way less firepower in comparison
Another option would be move the IPM1 down but not in this post
F-16C Barak-II
Ground RB:12.3-/12.3
This Aircraft doesnt have access to F&F munitions like other F-16’s hence it shouldnt be raised to same br.
Solution: Either keep it at same BR or add AGM65D’s to Barak-II arsenal.
2 Likes
Yes please, i am desperate for Israeli ordinance but in the mean time mavericks on our top tier jets is a step in the right direction, no top tier CAS jet should be limited to paveways only and bumped up in br
You mean like the Sd.Kfz 234/2, which already sits at 3.7?
The T18E2 should also be 3.7, better gun, stronger Armor. .50 cal proof.
2 Likes
Gaijin does not care about the Simulator players for some reason! I mean they are changing BR ratings, why not put a little more effort and make simulator battles better? It is just something i can never understand!
1 Like
i truly dont care about anything you say or anyone else that uses the term " u.s main " you people do nothing but whine about everything, but somehow stay silent on the eurofighter dodging missiles or the brimstones KH spam at top tier. , but the second the u,s tech tree gets anything remotely close and makes you brain dead whiny cry babies actually play the game instead and stops you from flying in a straight line, you cry nerfs. You do it to the F104, you say it about the F8U Crusaders, and the F-14s.
so… you’re trying to nerf the m1a1… while keeping it at the same BR? what?
💀 take the rambling to another thread if you aren’t going to discuss the BR changes
2 Likes
They are trying to make the IPM1 valid again, perfectly fine take imho and the abrams reload never should of gone down since it invalidates other struggling top tiers like the Challenger and Leclerc
1 Like
them lower the IPM1 to 10.7 , and i don’t see why you are comparing the m1a1 to other nations.
that was my second point but not to 10.7 instead the IPM1 in an ideal world would be 11.0
2 Likes
Why am I in the process of researching with the intent to play the Challenger 2s then, why do i have the type 10?
I play tanks based on how much i like them IRL, not their performance In game (hence why i haven’t touched the T-90m or 2A7HU)
IPM1
11.3–>11.0
Reason: Currently it shares its br with the now better M1A1 since the M1A1 got a reload buff to 5 seconds while retaining better firepower and having an equal reload. The IPM1 currently would fit better to the 11.0 bracket
3 Likes
jaguar in 10.7 not have bomb, AAM ,engine power, bad flight model stock is painful to play in 10.7 . but other aircraft like su25 a-10 got aim9 and r-60 not fair. and sometime up to11.7 jaguar with nothing vs mig23 .
If that’s your opinion then fine, i’ll leave you to it, however can we go back to civilly discussing the BR changes or lack thereof instead of personal attacks, I have made none towards you and do not intend on it.
1 Like
AMX A-1A 11.3 >10.7
Why is a completely mediocre attacker 0.4 BR lower than SU-25SM3?
It lacks ground ordinance compared to SU-25SM3 which is now being placed at 11.7 and although it has the same ammount of IR missiles, comparing the MAA-1 without IRCCM to R-73 is pure madness, has roughly similar top speed and turn rate.
Only thing better is that the AMX A-1A has really good RWR, but that doesnt make it any more combat competent.
4 Likes
anyways these BR changes are stupid the F-16s should never be moved down just like the migs should never be moved down mig 21 to 10.3? the SU 22s dont need to be moved down. These are some of the fastest bombers in the game. There is no reason for them to be moved down
.3 lower than AYIT/Lightning btw
Nothing said about the begleit of course…
gaijin stopped caring about sim when they started adding the same spam t series to nato tech trees, but they will ban you for team killing a tank that is 95% identical to a russian tank.