Vehicle: IS-2 (1944)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR change: 6.7-----> 6.3
Reason:It is obviously inferior to other 6.7 heavy tanks,it has many weakspots from any angle,while the gun is devastating if it does penetrate,it does frequently get caught on volumetric things (mantlets and such) ,and with the very long reload its quite sad
2 Likes
when the hell did you ever see me comment on this? are you fighting demons in your head?
Do you even read this forum? Have you seen ANY of my posts?
Existing lineups should definitely be considered when adjusting BRs imo, in ground of course, or else you get situations where some nations have a good tank at a certain BR but its a black hole and sucks to play because they have nothing else in that BR range to use it with
F105 10.0 —> 9.7 simulator
Every thing at its BR completes counters it because of there IR missiles. It has no flares and can not effectively dodge them. All it has is its speed, it has no ability to dogfight and its RWR isn’t the strongest either.
- It’s already happening according to the sheet
and 2. It’s a dumb idea frankly. It’s just compression.
Try again.
Nov 24 it moved from 12.3 ARB to 12.7. Now its going to 13.0 ARB.
1 Like
Better for both to be 9.3 if they are the same, XM-1 GM is fine at 9.3
i would say 6.7
They are not competitive, before they had their 5sec reload and except the abrams most of the others were at like 6 sec ? since then everyone has 5sec, leclerc has nothing correctly modelled from it’s armor to mobility, and has an inferior round, at least the Ariete has a good round but bad armor, leclerc has nothing good even it’s autoloader is a problem now has you have 3 crew only.
So leclerc should go down and eventually get shard.
It isn’t really, mobility is good, thermals are good, autoloader is good. But it lacks the basics like its shell or armor. OFL 120 F1 is absolutely trash compared to other rounds like DM53, 3BM60, M829A2, and so on. Spall is almost non existent. And its armor feels like you’re playing a tank made out of paper.
1 Like
F-16A OCU is a single seat… BARAK is a much fatter and even less engine’d double seater
Vehicle: F-1
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 10.0 ----> 9.7
Reason: While it has no contermeasures, with this BR changes it will face R-73 IRCCM missiles from Su-25BM, it already strugles against AIM-9L from A-10´s and R-60M from Su-25.
5 Likes
Vehicle: F-104j
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 10.3 ----> 10.0
Reason: With no flares and recent airframe nerfs this jet has bot great performance at 10.3. the J35D now at 10.0 with better airframe performance but the J35XD at 10.3 with the same missile loadout but with flares makes the F-104j difficult to play compared to other 10.3 or 10.0 jets.
7 Likes
Plus its awful transmission, which is another issue, but in this instance we should assume it is just this awful and will not get fixed.
2 Likes
Namer tzrikhon
11.0 → 10.7
unreliable armor, Bad mobilty, close range combat literally annihilates this vehicles chances of winning a fight. 11.3 is just cruel
2 Likes
it does have a better round irl lol
No.
No.
Now ask me if I think either of those prior questions means the IRIAF should magically be a lower BR just because its stock grind sucks the exact same way any other vehicles’ stock grind does?
Its more about how the derbys are bad, the OCU has amraams, so at least its good on BVR.
Shard is not for french leclercs,
French didnt intent to put it into service, the shard is a pure export round
1 Like
Is it the Derby’s that pull crazy off the rail or are those the MICA?