R-27ERs, the ‘normal’ R-27R could be used. MiG-29S added ER capability.
How many Me-163s do you see in the MM? do you see them often in uptiers at 9.7? Hunters with better airframe & 9Es are found at 9.3, MiG-19s, F-100s, MiG-21 F-13s are 9.3… but even they don’t see 163s.
Zero thought put into your comment.
No. And besides, all the 20mms (anything smaller than 30mm with an explosive round, really) are ludicrously overperforming anyway.
Three things:
- You are obviously not aware of that this is no discussion thread.
- If you would play more MG 151/20 aircraft you would be aware of that the cannon is underperforming compared to any other 20 mm cannon.
- If you feel the need to share your opinion - use this thread:
The Ger MiG-29 (9.12A) & MiG-29G nvr used 27s.
The Hun MiG-29 (9.12B) nvr used 27s
Zero thought put into your comment.
zero thought was put in your original comment
why would you put a plane with aim9l A HIGH PERFORMANCE ALL ASPECT MISSILE at 9.7!?
dont even come out at me saying this is somehow balanced
The Ger MiG-29 (9.12A) & MiG-29G nvr used 27s.
The Hun MiG-29 (9.12B) nvr used 27s
Never used, OR physically could not use because the 27R capability was removed?
The Ger MiG-29 (9.12A) & MiG-29G nvr used 27s.
whats that
fr bro as if there arent a bazillion flareless planes at 8.7-9.7
tbh i would rather remove the 9l from the bucc and lower it to 10.0
I mean I saw one guy who ran nothing but bombs get 3 kills in an uptier match shomehow. I feel like it would be fine /s
Seriously ? ? ?
UP BRing the french 7.0 that can be easily killed by panzer 4 from BR 4.0 is crazy, totally unnecessary
The AML 90 has worse round than the german Spz 12-3 , So if the aml goes to 7.3, SPz can goto 7.7 ?
Also why Vt5 goes to 11.0 while the object 292 casually sitting in at 10.7 ?
Dear gaijin please fire those low IQ people from the company or consider my uninstall
Mode: Naval Arcade & Realistic Battles
Ship: RN Zara and RN Pola
Change: 6.0 → 5.7
Reasoning: One of the longest reload times for 203 mm guns among its counterparts, weak damage from their 203 mm shells, low accuracy of the same 203 mm guns, lack of torpedo armament, not the best armor.
idk? what is that? which ver? i need more then just a single pic.
Dont bring down the tiger family hp to 600, they are already heavy, especially the jagdtiger being the heaviest. Even if you do lower it keer it at 690hp
SPz 12-3 LGS
Ground realistic
should remain at 6.7
Reason: It would be the only vehicle at 7.0, with the overtiered Kugelblitz, having no real lineup
(no, 2 vehicles are not a lineup)
Other nation also have recoilless rifles at 6.7.
- M50 in US
- Type 60 SPRG (C) in Japan
- FIAT 6614 in Italy
all of them have recoilless rifles at 6.7
Therefore the SPz should also remain at 6.7.
And if the 20mm is the problem: The Ratel 20 has a 20mm and MILAN ATGMs at 6.7.
its historical bro they arent changing it bc they felt like it
690 is historical
Most blatant egregious example is the Jap F-4EJ Kai which has 4x 9L’s & 4x 7F’s with a great radar to boot… and its 11.3 BR!
Shows how much you know, because the EJ Kai is 12.3 in RB. Not exactly a good justification for the Kurnass going down to 11.3.
Don’t try to make sense of what gaijin do, because I don’t think they even know what they’re doing; they’re just reacting to data they collect, which is often useless.
However the Type 90 moving to 11.7 while the M1A1 escapes yet another BR increase is criminal.
Oh, for sure.