get googlin then
alright so there is a whole bug report with documents proving the 600hp. If you got actual proof feel free to make a bug report
what does this prove again ?
Yeah yeah the classic “German Main stoopid” insult. Germany is simply a highly liked nation for many starters, of course they are bad players.
4 Likes
Correct, it is already struggling to penetrate T72s at its own BR unless the angle is perfect, not to mention when being uped Br to 9.7, having to face T64B, T80UD, T80B and T72AV+1989 all having some sort of sideskirt or ballistic protection ERA.
With how reactive the higher BR MBTs are, you do not even have any margin of error, not to mention, do you expect to win flanking fights against m1, lepards and vickers mk7 that is superior in traversing difficult terrains?
2 Likes
It doesnt, it has the same 900 PS HL 234 Engine as the 105 Tiger II.
1 Like
you honestly think an F-16 with up to 6 AIM-120s should be 13.0…
It’d be overpowered.
You know what’s more crazy?
12.0s having to fight an F-16 with fox3s.
They actually do. They choose not to change the Tiger I E.
It’s for accuracy?
it should get nerfed to the correct, historical figure,
having the ags be 11.7 with less than 400mm pen is insane
RDF LT and other high tier light tanks have less that 400mm.
Anyway it’s more than enough pen to easily go through most weakspots.
amx32 is just another leopard 1a5 with 20mm autocanon, just rollback the br ffs
1 Like
f5a is close enough in performance to f5e that it shouldnt matter.
f5e has very slightly better max speed, but has worse sustained turn at medium-high speeds.
f5e only wins the fight at very low speeds where you shouldnt go anyway.
NF5A is close enough.
Regular F-5A/Cs can’t keep up with the E performance wise.
XM800T going up again while 7.7 France is left as it is
Yea, years ago when the game introduced these vehicles for the first time. Back then it was OP. Today the game is developed to the point where its no longer an issue for giving Strikers and Bombers an airspawn by default–maps are bigger, saturation of prems, every vehicle has high top speed and acceleration and weapons to beat down these Strikers and Bombers.
Rest of my suggestions is within context of what is going up and what is going down and what is staying where they are.
type 90 > type 10. the round makes no difference at 12.0 and type 90 is faster, stronger and has more rounds in the rack.
1 Like
Did the rate of fire and mobility of the Tiger II (10.5 cm Kw.K) remain unchanged because they were omitted?
yeah, it cant just consider how powerful it is when fully researched the modifications
Object 140
BR: 8.3 (NO CHANGE)
The object 140 offers no significant combat capability advantage over its 8.3 russian cousin and counterpart MBTs.
It is simply a mix of T-55 and T-10M’s capability, giving up 3BM25 APFSDS and reload time, to trade for an optical range finder a better APHE around, marginally armor and 14.5mm HMG.
It is a tank comparable to M60A1 AOS, which has better APDS options when it comes to a universal situation. Better at dealing with up-BR situations or heavy armour situations such as suddenly facing another m60 or t72, with better ballistic to aim for weakspots and angled penetration to deal with said targets.
At the same time, Object 140 lacks gimmicks (auxiliary features) or so called “the tools” to combat 9.3 environment comfortably, compare to other MBT of this BR, such as laser range finder and DM23/m111 level of APFSDS (Type 59D1, Olifant Mk.1 or M48GA2).
You are consistently playing the game of “what shell do I pick”, using a mediocre APDS, BR-standard HEAT or a good but not perfect APHE around and calculating the trade off consistently. This requires more thinking and planning, map knowledge and aim management as you can not simply aim center mass at every tank.
This tank rewards its players for being careful and patient, with the same trade-off in any other 8.3 medium. At the same time, being inferior to every 8.7 tank out there, lacking the equipment or specialty like 122MT, M60A1 RISE or AMX-30 BRENUS, no thermals, no APFSDS, no laser range finder, no active protection, no ERA. It is just an all-rounder of 8.3 and does not deverse nor have the ability to fight 9.7s.
As we already know, player statistics do not fully correlate with tank capability, as Object 140 sits at a good but niche BR with better premium options to go for at 9.3, 10.3 or 11.3/7, If the devs truly believe it is over-performing, then i would recommend removing the optical range finder and that’s about it.
41 Likes