Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2024

LOL

You’re kidding, right?

1 Like

M4A3 (105) should go to 3.3, but it does have a hull MG weakspot just like any other sherman.


2381_rd
Yeah they were fielded with the Aim-9L

5 Likes

Exactly. You can’t solve compression by moving it to another part of the game.

The system is fine, what’s bad is how it is used. There is a ton of compression, and these changes just make it worse.

3 Likes

its just HVAP, but it has about the same flat pen as APDS at 91mm iirc.

1 Like

How much indignation the April BR change caused among players, it is obvious that the developers have a bad memory and have forgotten the riot of last year. It is also clear that the developers do not play their game, so I think that players should, on the contrary, support the most stupid changes possible.
I applaud the transfer of Mig-15 and Saber to Br 8.0, and the dead fleet in the game with the transfer of Br in the small fleet and Eugen and Hipper back to 5.7 will become even more dead.

These changes will increase hatred and toxicity of the game, which will lead to an outflow of people from the game and reduce Gaijin income. A capitalist only understands the language of money, and if he wants to destroy the game with stupid decisions, then we need to help him with this.
Bravo Gaijin, I applaud your stupidity.

1 Like

Did you have a small simple thought that changes to aircraft, tanks and fleet should be done at different times? Тhen 1 proposal from one player would make more sense

1 Like

Funny how they ignore the most blatant overpowered vehicles once again…

There’s no reason to ask to the community what should change when you simply do what you want either way…

4 Likes

I already play Italy, I just wanted to keep my 5.7 lineup…

As RUS main player,
2S38 definitely not belong 10.0, it is very easy get 1 shot kill at 10.0br.
I will say 9.3~9.7 is where 2S38 really should be.

1 Like

m

I want whatever you’re chain-smoking if you genuinely think that’s even close to a good idea.

10 Likes

Nah.

Just because it can be one shot, does not mean it should go down.

1 Like

M1 KVT can be one shot by the 2S38 and its 10.3 so that means by your logic it should be 9.3 ~ 9.7 too, fair.

1 Like

The 76MM M551 should stay at 6.7, first of all with fewer shells and no HEATFS, should not have the same level as the T92, the M18 should stay at 5.7, he does not have the ability to match the German tanks

1 Like

*1.0, clearly it should be the russian reserve tank.

/s

In all seriousness, wtf is the 2S38’s br- that thing can face late centurions

Hey Gaijin, can we get the Ariete tanks that are 11.3 and 11.7 down to 11.0 and 11.3. They are just not really competitive at the top tier environment. They don’t have a 5 second reload that the Abrams, Leclercs, Type 10s have. They don’t have spall liners or armor to survive tanking a hit like the STRV 122B, Leo 2A7, Challengers, and T-90M. They aren’t that quick to get to good positions. They are just up at a BR cause there had to be something for them to be there but I feel that has really effected the way top tier italy is handled. You can see more Centauros over the Arietes due to the Arietes lack of anything to set them apart.

Welp… I explained almost everything on this topic…

3 Likes

Dont do the fox dirty like that :(

He said it himself.

Theres no need for further jokes.

I don’t think the M64 should be the same BR as the M18 as it is inferior to the M18 in just about every measure. It’s slower, carries less ammo, has worse acceleration, it just isn’t as good.