so SPAAs having any chance against a cas plane is bad?
when piloted by a decent player currently only strela and osa akm has even a chance to kill it and those are 10.3.
yak 130 can either evade or outrange all other SPAA around.
Thank you for looking into the issue. Something like this wouldn’t warrant an increase in the aircraft’s battle rating, as the AIM-9Ls simply aren’t as strong as they used to be.
Vehicle: C1 Ariete WAR/C1 Ariete Certezza
Mode: GRB
Change: 11.7 → 11.3
Reason: Currently at 11.7 the C1 Arietes are comparably the worst survivability MBT’s to any other MBT at that BR.
2 Likes
This, but for ALL R2Y2s since they have effectively the same performance.
You have a source for 32PDR APDS out of curiosity?
and doesn’t have the range of the gbu-39s, or the ease of use, which would simply be easier to gun at that point. I’ll get back to the grind part in a bit. only thing that makes sense here is the difference in BR competition, other than that it’s also an asumption and you again have 0 evidence a significant amount of j-22 players ground pound in ARB. “I’m right either way” [insert obama giving a medal to obama meme]
I was talking about their ARB performance clearly, not GRB in that paragraph.
absolutely terrible argument when the j22 costs $60 USD and the su-30mk2 recently went on sale for $40. absurd you couldn’t understand it without me laying it out so plainly, but hey. you really just want to insist some guy is out there ground pounding in arb using a mediocre 9.0 plane that costs $60 instead of using it where most people know what it’s good at, CAS in grb
“im right everyone else is wrong”, oh and take a look at the mirror
i dont think you know what the difference is between the numbers 1 and 5, compared to 9 and 10 at this point lmao
Amen.
1 Like
Unfortunately it would. As they are already on or above the average efficiency for their BR. AIM-9L would only increase their efficiency even more, not reduce it or keep it the same. Which would require a BR increase. So they cannot receive new missiles and stay the same BR.
2 Likes
So IS-2 1944 and Tiger 2 Nr.1-50 moving down to 6.3 and yet M26 Pershing is still 6.7?? what makes them worse than M26 Pershing?
9 Likes
I made suggestions for all three. They count as separate vehicles and must be suggested separately.
2 Likes
Vehicle : Super Etendard
Mode : Air Realistic
Change : 10.3 > 10.3 (Add something for stock aircraft)
Reason : Super Etendard probably have one of the worst stock grind at its tier. Like not even any stock bombs seriously???
5 Likes
Don’t worry devs, this will still sell like hotcakes even if it is properly balanced at 11.0.
A-7D
Air realistic
10.3 → 9.3
What about the F-4F and its 9L?
Because this plane sits on 8.7(i still have no idea why) plus if you lover br on mig jets on 7.7 will have to fight a subsonic plane with rockets, good luck with that
I have to disagree with this one. Comet with the same cannon already struggles a lot at 5.3 and Concept 3 already went up in BR recently, while the gun doesn’t feel that great to justify BR increase, I believe it would make it frustrating to play even with APDS at that BR.
There was a suggestion here already to move Comet down to 5.0, which would be my preferred choice.
If the Ho-Ri is getting removed, I hope something is coming to replace it. All these years later nothing really resolves the BF gap between the Panther and the leopard or the Tiger II and the M48.
1 Like
Upgrade it’s engine, transform it into the FAW.22, give it Firestreak x2, and move it to 8.3.
FAW.20 is pretty unappealing in its current state.
2 Likes
A-7E
Air Realistic
10.3 → 9.3
A-7D and A-7E are still far too high. They’re pretty much just slightly worse Harriers.
2 Likes
its just too strong against ground to keep at 7.7.
its also much better against cas than veak 40 and zsu 37 2.
the 30-20mm armor all around means it can withstand aircraft cannons very well.