Unfortunately it would. As they are already on or above the average efficiency for their BR. AIM-9L would only increase their efficiency even more, not reduce it or keep it the same. Which would require a BR increase. So they cannot receive new missiles and stay the same BR.
2 Likes
So IS-2 1944 and Tiger 2 Nr.1-50 moving down to 6.3 and yet M26 Pershing is still 6.7?? what makes them worse than M26 Pershing?
6 Likes
I made suggestions for all three. They count as separate vehicles and must be suggested separately.
2 Likes
Vehicle : Super Etendard
Mode : Air Realistic
Change : 10.3 > 10.3 (Add something for stock aircraft)
Reason : Super Etendard probably have one of the worst stock grind at its tier. Like not even any stock bombs seriously???
3 Likes
Don’t worry devs, this will still sell like hotcakes even if it is properly balanced at 11.0.
A-7D
Air realistic
10.3 → 9.3
What about the F-4F and its 9L?
Because this plane sits on 8.7(i still have no idea why) plus if you lover br on mig jets on 7.7 will have to fight a subsonic plane with rockets, good luck with that
I have to disagree with this one. Comet with the same cannon already struggles a lot at 5.3 and Concept 3 already went up in BR recently, while the gun doesn’t feel that great to justify BR increase, I believe it would make it frustrating to play even with APDS at that BR.
There was a suggestion here already to move Comet down to 5.0, which would be my preferred choice.
If the Ho-Ri is getting removed, I hope something is coming to replace it. All these years later nothing really resolves the BF gap between the Panther and the leopard or the Tiger II and the M48.
1 Like
Upgrade it’s engine, transform it into the FAW.22, give it Firestreak x2, and move it to 8.3.
FAW.20 is pretty unappealing in its current state.
2 Likes
A-7E
Air Realistic
10.3 → 9.3
A-7D and A-7E are still far too high. They’re pretty much just slightly worse Harriers.
2 Likes
its just too strong against ground to keep at 7.7.
its also much better against cas than veak 40 and zsu 37 2.
the 30-20mm armor all around means it can withstand aircraft cannons very well.
Yes, developers have been conveniently using fake L23s for years while developing the game.
1 Like
Keep hoping. I know that feeling, sometime your post will have 200 like but nothing will change, but one day one of your proposal will make it, happened several time to me !
1 Like
They hiss like feral cats at you if you bring up the O-I like I did so don’t bother.
KD is not a good way to balance these planes because new and unskilled players are buying their way into this tier.
These planes are blatantly overtiered based on similar capabilities of other 13.3 & 13.7 aircraft. They don’t have to be the best 13.7s to deserve moving there.
The AIM-9Ls would definitely improve the two British Phantoms, but they wouldn’t make them overpowered. The Tornado F.3 is already at the same battle rating with a much stronger loadout, so there’s no reason the British F-4s, especially in their current state, shouldn’t receive them as well.
3 Likes
Ariete is galaxies away from the Sagi 2, so it should stay 9.3.
But the Sagittario 2 needs to go to 9.0 yesterday. It is totally unfit to be a 9.3.
1 Like
Gbu39 doesnt have much range either considering a10c speed but whatever. Ease of use yes. Numbers yes. Hence why it has bigger numbers. And j22 has more and better munitions (for arb) than a6e hence why it has better numbers.
You can use both and score more kills in total.
My bad then.
Player could buy j22, play grb then move to arb once they need rp/sl. Without having to spend more money on smth else.
Looked at mirror, saw person whos opinion is based on smth more than youtube videos.
Its not 1 and 5 vs 9 and 10 buddy.