Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
85

Proposed change of G-91Y: 9.0 > 9.3 should not happen.

It is inferior in general peformance to Cl-13B and outright worse than the F4D, this plane is fine at 9.0 and does not need to be uptiered into stuff like the Mig-21SMT/MF, J35XS, F-8E, who all have far superior flight performance and missiles, it should also not have to face stuff like the A-10 and Su-25 with all aspect missiles.

It also makes no sense why this plane should be the same BR as the Ariete, Mig19S/Mig19PT/F-106/F101 and many other 9.3’s that simply blow it out of the water performance wise.

Requested change: Leave the G.91Y at 9.0, it does not need to be uptiered to fight planes that it has very little to no counterplay against.

27 Likes
86

Ground RB

Churchill I

3.3 → 3.0

It does not provide a significant upgrade over the B1 Ter but should remain slightly higher due to the better main gun

16 Likes
87

Zero meaningful AIR RB changes, great.

Aim-9L’s on the F-14A is the only interesting thing.

No decompression whatsoever.

Beautiful.

7 Likes
88

A6M6c being the worst of the zeros and still getting uptiered will always be funny to me

28 Likes
89

China and the USA F-5E neither have ballistic computers nor path storage. Isn’t it unreasonable to use 2 AIM-9P and 4 AGM-65B in 11.3?

2 Likes
90

Insanity.

1 Like
91

Su-30MKV and MKK STILL not going up?
It’s blatant enough at this point that you, the devs, are handholding those vehicles while throwing the balance completely out of the window.
Thank you, really.
What are your statistics and are they in the room with us right now?

26 Likes
92

And RIP hunter F6.

11 Likes
93

We’ve been speaking about the removal of the Ho-Ri being within our general considerations for at least 2 years at this stage. Along with the advanced notice now (giving people plenty of chance to obtain them), there is no “FOMO” here.

Its something many players have requested we address.

10 Likes
94

Air RB
Venom FB.4

8.7 → 8.3

While a good plane, it is no match for a Lim-5 of F-86F-2, its equivalents are 8.0 or 8.3

21 Likes
95

image
Getting an IIR AIM-9J would be pretty nice instead of just a generic AIM-9L copy paste… (Fater air to air missile)

3 Likes
96

BRs should be in control of experienced players. These never ending BR changes every few months and moving vehicles up and down again and again is just ridiculous. You have no idea how to balance this game, your data about vehicles´ performace are wrong and its time proven fact.

13 Likes
97

Is there any relationship between 37mm APHE and 57mm APHE?
In addition, Gaijin has also approved the report on the lack of APHE for PGZ88 on the issue channel

1 Like
98

Indiscriminately reloading speed buffs are genuinely foolish.
In truth, the real appeal of World War II combat lies in its slow pace.
WT is a vehicle game, not FPS.

10 Likes
99

M1A2 SEPv3 SEPv2 Trophy SEPv2 SEPv1
from 12.7 to 11.7
reason:its really bad it has no autoloader so t72 outloads you also has no armor and i keep dying to fuel explosions for some reason and bmpt makes it suffer

2 Likes
100

IAR-81C

2.7 → 2.7 (unchanged).
performance is abysmal, no reason for it to increase

9 Likes
101

So what’s your plan to fill the Capability (not br) gap? Add the real Ho-ri or the O-I? Maybe the Japanese purchase Panther?

1 Like
102

Air RB,

Vampire FB.5

8.0 → 7.3

This thing is miserable to play, and has less thrust spaded than all other vampires have stock

26 Likes
103

Could we ever see replacement for it in the future with more realistic one?
Or some other vehicle in heavy category.

1 Like
105

Mode : Ground Realistic
Vehicle : AMX-32
BR change : 9.7 > 9.3
Reason : It’s not really mobile , the gun handling isn’t particulary good , armor wise it’s just auto-canon proof , if anything it’s just a Leopard 1a5 with a 20mm but worse shell.

24 Likes