Brother At 9.7 it has NO flares NO rwr
Cannot fight back against SPAA
you want it even higher? should have stayed at 9.3
Vehicle: RAH-66 Comanche
Gamemode: All
Suggestion: Add AGM-114K Hellfires
Reason: The last round of “balance changes” resulted in the vast majority of Helicopters carrying AGM-114B Hellfires, having them replaced with the slightly better AGM-114K Hellfire. The RAH-66 Comanche was seemingly forgotten as it was left out of that pool of helicopters that got that change. The RAH-66 has very little going for it, and it has no business carrying any less than AGM-114K’s considering it was developed with the intention of using the AGM-114L; and was developed well after the AGM-114Bs were being replaced with the K variant. The RAH-66 Should receive the AGM-114K as its only fair (even ignoring reality) given that every other Hellfire carrier around it has K’s now, not B’s; meanwhile the RAH-66 has nearly nothing going for it besides being relatively small in size compared to other attack helicopters. Its missing countermeasures, and the stealth mechanics it has arent really all that useful against the SPAA it faces in its BR range; on top of that in order to use that stealth, you have to standoff between 7-8km away from SPAA (assuming its radar is bad enough it cant see you or your missiles) to not show up, while doing so makes hellfires have a flight time of almost 40 seconds, meaning likely your target will either be gone (dies to something else or loses Line-of-sight) or the missile itself just gets shot down, or YOU get shot down, wasting the missile.
3 Likes
Object248
br6.7 to 6.3
I believe the Soviet Object 248 should be moved from BR 6.7 down to 6.3. This vehicle performs quite poorly at 6.7 as it is, and considering that the German Tiger II (P) is being considered for a downtier from 6.7 to 6.3, an IS-2 model 1943 hull with a 100mm gun at 6.7 simply has very weak armor protection. Compared to the Tiger II (P), its armor is even weaker, but it has slightly better mobility and roughly equivalent firepower. It could serve as a solid addition to the Soviet lineup at BR 6.3
4 Likes
Ground RB
Tiger II H 6.7-7.0.
Great armor，powerful long 88mm gun，7.5S reload.
Just follow T26E5
2 Likes
248 is fine
very strong
I think it’s stupid to blame other nations on gaijins balance.
Churchills don’t deserve to go up. Even with the APHE they’ve been just fine.
5 Likes
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: B-29A-BN
Change: 7.0 to 6.7
Justification: Bombers are in an extremely poor state in Air RB as of right now, and this bomber going up against early jets (and even MiG-15s in a full uptier) is simply cannon fodder. The days of this bomber wiping out every base and winning matches are long gone.
8 Likes
Vehicle: Ki-94-II
Mode: Air Realistic
BR: 6.0 to 5.7/5.3 or even lower
I’m glad to hear that the Ki-87 is finally getting moved down, though I think the same should be done to my beloved Ki-94-II.
Both are incredibly similar in performance and feature similarly abysmal stats. They should share the same BR.
3 Likes
Moving the G.91 Y up is gonna really kill it in air RB.
1 Like
Ground RB
Tiger II P keep stay 6.7.
M26 is still on BR6.7, TigerIIP will go to 6.3？Why？
Are U seriously？
7 Likes
Well it is aboslute shit IRL, it’s a training aircraft, and it entered service in 2007, 2 years after the F-22.
And the flight model is insanely good, it pulls 9 to 11G between 1000kph and 600, there isn’t a lot of planes in-game that have such a good turn rate. it has as well very efficient engines, and can carry TV guided bombs; and at 9.7, it faces in full downtier canon only SPAA, that are absolute useless. At 9.7 are the first Ir guided missiles that are dodged so easily. At 10.à, yo get 20mm miniguns; at 10.7-110 you get the Osa, Strella, and Stormer HVM. In my opinion, it would still be good at 10.0.
for at least 2 years at this stage
Reading hard I guess. They mentioned this YEARS ago.
b-29 vs mig-15 is historical
When Cromwell V will be move up to same BR as Chaffee, why is not Chaffee move up too, when it’s much better than Cromwell V thanks to usable reverse speed and stabiliser?
1 Like
People use su39 and su30mk2/mkk in arb to grind tech tree. Both are strongest cas jets at their brs. If you buy premium it doesnt unlock entire tt, you still need to grind it. And in arb/asb you can grind much faster.
They will be relevant as soon as statshark starts differentiating modes.
Or maybe average playerbase is too ignorant to gain some speed and climb to 5 km and start ground pounding stuff from 10+ km.
so do you have any actual counterargument? or are you going to send more shit my way
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Ru 251
Change: BR 7.3 → 7.7
- reload 7,5 sec → 6,7 sec
As the Ru 251 now has APHE, 7.3 is a bit low for it. However as at higher BR IFVs and autoloading vehicles are much more common the reload should be improved similar to the M48.
4 Likes
T58
All Gamemodes
8.7 → 10.0
A 155mm gun capable of dishing out HESH/HEAT shells that disables most functions on a tank every 2.5 seconds has no business being at 8.7.
Especially the turret armor, which can block most shots at the BR range thanks to the Volumetric Armor.
5 Likes
B58 shouldn’t be 8.7 anyhow
lol using cas plane in arb to grind TT instead of the su-39’s and su-30mk2, interesting, any evidence at all besides your assumptions?
why don’t you try sideclimbing for 5 minutes every game to get into a decent position for cas? very good use of time, I’m sure the j-22 takes 10 minutes according to your logic. most players in any nation do not play conservatively because the time spent to consistent reward ratio is not there, nice shit