for at least 2 years at this stage
Reading hard I guess. They mentioned this YEARS ago.
b-29 vs mig-15 is historical
When Cromwell V will be move up to same BR as Chaffee, why is not Chaffee move up too, when it’s much better than Cromwell V thanks to usable reverse speed and stabiliser?
People use su39 and su30mk2/mkk in arb to grind tech tree. Both are strongest cas jets at their brs. If you buy premium it doesnt unlock entire tt, you still need to grind it. And in arb/asb you can grind much faster.
They will be relevant as soon as statshark starts differentiating modes.
Or maybe average playerbase is too ignorant to gain some speed and climb to 5 km and start ground pounding stuff from 10+ km.
so do you have any actual counterargument? or are you going to send more shit my way
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Ru 251
Change: BR 7.3 → 7.7
- reload 7,5 sec → 6,7 sec
As the Ru 251 now has APHE, 7.3 is a bit low for it. However as at higher BR IFVs and autoloading vehicles are much more common the reload should be improved similar to the M48.
3 Likes
T58
All Gamemodes
8.7 → 10.0
A 155mm gun capable of dishing out HESH/HEAT shells that disables most functions on a tank every 2.5 seconds has no business being at 8.7.
Especially the turret armor, which can block most shots at the BR range thanks to the Volumetric Armor.
1 Like
B58 shouldn’t be 8.7 anyhow
lol using cas plane in arb to grind TT instead of the su-39’s and su-30mk2, interesting, any evidence at all besides your assumptions?
why don’t you try sideclimbing for 5 minutes every game to get into a decent position for cas? very good use of time, I’m sure the j-22 takes 10 minutes according to your logic. most players in any nation do not play conservatively because the time spent to consistent reward ratio is not there, nice shit
Yes, obviously, but that is not a valid argument. “King Tiger vs M4A1 (75) is historical” is also true, but the performance disparity between the two makes it so that their BRs are markedly different. The same goes for the B-29 and MiG - the MiG cleans up the Stratofortress without a contest.
Knew the M61 change to churchill/cromwell/valentine was going to be a poisoned chalice.
Time to send them to BRs that have no line-ups.
1 Like
How tf are yall putting the f14A iraf at 13.7 that’s just stupid
1 Like
It’s more op br for br than the BMPT
Yet people complain more about the BMPT
Ground RB
Super Hellcat 6.3-6.3
Compared to normal M18， The Super Hellcat gets a 90mm gun at the cost of reduced mobility.
3 Likes
People failing the awareness check
1 Like
Suggestion
HMS Egret
4.3>4.0
Although the AB+Y position of the turrets is on paper better than HMS Calpe (her nearest British counterpart) the reality is the latter’s superfiring X turret has very good arcs and is less restricted than appears. Egrets Y turret also has worse arcs than the other Calpe/Brissendon.
Meanwhile Egret is also 10kts Slower than Calpe (and 20kts less than most nations 4.x DDs) , has worse reverse speed, engine control, and rudder authority. As a result if targeted she can be a sitting duck.
Secondary/AA is limited to 4x 20mm sat close together midships with no mid range 40mm. Frontal blind arcs are limiting, and they can only counter air/PT boats at very close ranges.
In addition unlike HMS Brissendon, Calpes sister also at 4 3 she has no torpedos.
Thus 1 moderate positive, several disadvantages.
1 Like
top tier has more players than mid tier, and the BMPT created a reputation for being far more broken at 10.3, 10.7, because we already know gaijin can’t balance
BMPT is also Russian
That fact alone makes people hard-focus on it
Gamemode: RB / SB
Vehicle: Tiger II Sla.16
Change:
Engine power 680hp@3000rpm → 750hp @2000rpm
Top speed 47 kph → 42 kph
The nerf to the Diesel Tiger was ahistorical and did not match the standard as layed out in this report: Community Bug Reporting System
4 Likes
So we are just using stats to balance?