I think you should read this
The T20s BR is not absurd. It’s extremely strong.
F-14 Iriaf is apparently better than the premium su30s lmao
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
What are you yapping about with the T20? thing is 6.3 now with 149 max pen… stop nerfing it, omg.
If it wasn’t built, it should not be in the game.
At 11.7, China already has two Z-10s. Moving the Z-19 up to 11.7 as well means China would have 4 helicopters at that BR, which seems like too many. I think keeping it at its original BR would have been a more reasonable choice.
Or do like the Italian tree (which has more fireflies than the British??) and add the Ic (cast hull) at 4.7 to keep it there and help bridge the gap and up the welded hull Vc to 5.0 with APDS to build up the 5.0 gap.
SARB
USS Aylwin
3.7→4.3
Why is the BR reduced by 1.0 compared to Yugure, which has the near same firepower, just because the turret cover and hull armor were removed? This should be corrected.
I would believe you If you have said 10+ kills but “lot of screens with 20+ grb” is obvious bs. This thing is too slow to do that many kills consistently. Not mentioning you get bombed 90% of time, flanked or enemy team gives up.
I am now convinced the F-14 Shahcat is the greatest “skill” (i want to use another word but that’s not allowed on the forums) check in the game
Never seen a topic taking that much time to reach 5k replies (it’s been 3h)
only thing this forum post has convinced anyone sane about is that gaijin is completely incapable of sane balancing
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Pvkv m/43 (1946)
Change: Move slpgr m/43 modification to Tier II
Justification: As it stands, Sweden’s stock grind is extremely painful as you are stuck with stock uncapped AP rounds. Other vehicles at the same BR either have a competent shell stock or can unlock it at Tier I or II.
Vehicles: amx-32(105) and amx-32
Battle rating: 9.3 → 9.0 and 9.7 → 9.3
Reason: compares to be the Leopard A1A1 and 1A5 they have some trades, mainly on the gun, and this big BR difference is kind strange when you look at the AMXs and Leoparda
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D and Mirage 2000D-RMV
Battle rating: 11.3 → 11.0 and 11.7 → 11.3 on ground battles
Reason: these jets are worse than they fighter version at 11.3, being the Mirage 2000C, only having 2 IR missiles, no gun stock and a worse radar making you need to see the targets at close range and not predict where they are going to be.
Vehicle: YAK-38/YAK-38M
Air Realistic
Change: 9.3 → 9.0/8.7 OR Addition of R-60M
Reason: There is absolutely no reason this subsonic should be the same BR as the F-104A and a step down from the AV-8A, it actively turns worse than every other aircraft in the BR, you can’t out speed any other aircraft (as you will simply be run down and missiled by almost everything you face), no countermeasures, and good luck using the R-60s without getting the drop on your target.
Further proves my point that stats are heavily skewed by arb. Hence why stats are irrelevant for grb discussions.
That just proves that j22 has lower skill floor. And tram users tend to fly straight instead of using it properly. Also lets not forget j22 has much lower br in arb which as I said before skews stats. While retaining all smart weaponry.
Tor mostly because it has biggest scan angles at that brs. Kosavas on other hand dont need big scan angles to shoot down.
GRB
AFT-09
9.0→10.3
There’s no way it would be a 9.0 when it’s superior to LOSAT in every way.
We need a decompression 13.0-14.7 BR. Add 15.3 pls
source? i cant find that in the document