M44’s mobility easily can carry it to 5.0
M55 just needs to make the cannon have a pen difference of more than 1 mm, since it makes to difference and will be stopped by the same armor as the M44
2 Likes
Compressing grb even more. At least air wise.
Ground RB
T-14
4.7 → 5.0
with the Churchill VII moving up, this thing should be too
4 Likes
And maybe a slightly quicker reload
Because I want to grind China?
And to see for myself how stupidly op they are
1 Like
and wdym by better heat more pen might be too powerful
A6M5 up to 6.0 while the F8F sits pretty at 4.7 lmao wild
2 Likes
if you think china is “stupidly op” youre in for an eye opening grind
you are what you complain about its filled with skilled players who complain about it and spam it like you but is it really skill or is it just the jet carrying
ZSU-23-4M2
Ground Realistic
7.3 → 7.7
It have extremely effective anti aircraft guns, mounted on a okay mobile platform with a lot of turret traverse, meaning that it tear apart any planes that it faces. The plane it faces doesn’t even have a chance against it, since most of them are WW2 or just post war jets with low manoeuvrability.
Even without a radar, because of its high traverse speed, and high velocity ammo, it has no major problem engaging faster moving targets at close range, or planes further away within reasonable distance. Also with it having 4000 rounds of ammunition + an extra 4000 round from the ammo box, it is near impossible for it to run out of ammo.
3 Likes
I don’t
Where did anything I say suggest that
@Stona_WT , I hope you’re doing well.
I keep coming back to every post about rating changes to ask the same thing… Please consider including in the spreadsheet the changes being considered for “air simulation” battles; even if there are no changes, please mention it in the main text.
There’s no way to discuss something you can’t see—except, of course, for the black holes discovered by Albert Einstein.
We exist!
Vehicle : F-104G (China)
Mode : Air Realistic
Change : 10.7 > 10.3
Reason : I have no idea why this thing is at 10.7. F-104J in Japanese tree has more missiles and that thing is a 10.3. Moving F-104G down to 10.3 probably make a bit more sense.
8 Likes
I do very well even with bad planes
Hop off your alt account
1 Like
Looking at GRB plane BR reduction.
Looking at crying ground posts.
xDDDDD
A TOTAL OF 219 planes got GRBBR reduced yeyeeeee
Yeah, nothing super positive or polite to say about that. I did see the Super Hellcat is going to 6.7 for some asinine reason and the T26E5 is going to 7.0? But no, lets put the German and Soviet heavy tanks at the same BR as the US’s medium tanks. That’ll work out just fine.
2 Likes
don’t have a alt bro
Tiger 2 and Tiger 2 Sla16
6.7 → 7.0
Both of these vehicles are essentially counterparts to the T26E5, trading some mobility for a way more powerful gun, with the T26E5 going up to 7.0 so should the tiger 2 Hs or the T26E5 should remain in 6.7 given they are very similar tanks in role and performance
6 Likes
riiiight
So how come you’re so “knowledgeable” about top tier stuff when you barely have anything on that account?
Not to mention this
3 Likes
There is written sources and reports about testing of the prototype vehicle, if it was built is not a question and hasn’t been for years.
The issue according to Gaijin is that they still lack the necessary information to model it accurately in game, not that they doubt it exists.
2 Likes