In my opinion, I would give all those tanks a higher BR (around BR 8.7 or 9.0), but it would significantly increase the bonuses for detecting enemies and for enemies killed by those detected. The main benefit would be that a reconnaissance vehicle could function as a reconnaissance vehicle.
I’m using the AMX10P at BR 8.0, and there are matches where I get more kills with it than with the AMX30 and the DF105, thanks to the 20mm APDS working correctly, except when the server misses several shots.
why is it that every br decrease you’ve put out is for a russian vehicle and every increase a non-russian one lol?
Tiger 10.5 cm + Panther II works pretty well
Could you please not hide information like removal of a vehicle in a post about BR Changes next time.
The m103 7.7 isn’t a good tank! All the US heavies with AP/ HEAT - not for me. Tanks with long reloads should slap
People saying HEAT for m103 but it cant 1 pop the tiger 2 thats 800m away on the test drive without moving -i tried for a while earlier and not even a lucky 1.
Good armour thats it- bounced a few but HEAT/rockets take it out no probs
The T29 has no issue 1 popping the tiger, 2 need to feed the snail for the power :(
I was just looking for something to use with the T114 / heli after update… somehow BR 7.0 t29 is looking like the best option and uptier.
Have flown against it a few times. It’s a piece of junk.
all you people are doing is showing where your bias lies. there is no justification for the t26e5 or the churchill to go up in br while the tiger 2p and the is-2 go down
They said that there will be a seperate post
So what’s your actual issue?
Is it the T26 and T29 or is it the M103?
The M103s performance is not relevant for the T26 and T29 discussion.
if the in game lead indicator was correct and not bounce between overshooting and on target or the lock attempts actually worked first try id agree to this, ive had plenty of times where a aircraft was flying right at me and i had to hit the radar lock button like 4-10 times before it actually locked the target
its actually a AU-1, a much, much heavier airframe than the F4U-4B, designed to be an attacker, so id add a reclassing of the F4U-7 to the attacker class, due to just how heavy this thing feels compared to the F4U-4s
no, but your shell does have lower velocity and you can use it to your advantage by shooting over rocks at longer ranges
This is kind of a total slop update in my opinion, fixing things and breaking things at the same time for no reason at all. For example the Mig-25… WHY are you guys INCREASING the mig-25 to 11.0?! It was perfect at 10.7 did everyone forget this thing has no guns only 4 decent missiles, a turning radius of the state of texas, and an abysmal speed gain rate that takes forever for the jet to actually get to a speed where its effective. It climbs decently and zooms straight to about mach 1.5 and then takes AGES to get up beyond that which you really never see in any match anyways. The only positive this jet had going for it was its top speed and altitude ability so long as you side climbed and stayed fast but that doesnt even really work for it since its flares are equal to that of tossing kids firecrackers out the window and anyone with an aim 7f or r24r can end your high speed school bus in an instant. The Mig 25 is already a very handicapped niche play style jet that takes a lot of luck to play well honestly. The overall increase to 11.0 is absolutely ridiculous. Gaijin drop it back to 10.7 or ACTUALLY give it a pulse doppler radar like its supposed to have. This is disgusting.
The dusty M103 is another story- not sure why it lives at 7.7
The T26 is being moved to 7.0 where the t29 already has better global stats than the T26 but stays as its premium is selective to say the least
If tanks are being moved because of stats then sort all the offenders.
MiG-25 could see 9.7 subsonics. In fact, even at 11.0 it will see a few like Hunter 58 and Hawk 200/209, and MANY who cannot detect its radar on RWR at all since it is J-band - if they even have an RWR.
Unless uptiered the only real option to most is wait until it runs out of fuel and then park in front of its airfield. And the MiG-25 carries enough fuel to never have to do that.
It has very little issues shooting R-40RDs straight down.
EDIT: also if the current changes go live, the Hunter F.6 with no RWR, no countermeasures, and four SRAAMs will face the MiG-25PD.
the T29 was already sorted, and hit with a reload nerf, thing used to be 6.7 a few years back, and has been around long before the T26E5 was, so the results are gonna be a bit skewed
the PD in MiG-25PD does not stand for Pulse Dopplar
Because it’s similar to the Conqueror and both of them are good sniper tanks
The T26E5 has better turret armour, slightly worse, but still great hull armour and it trades firepower for much faster reloading, I’d say it’s fair for the two to be at the same BR
Why do you think are people asking for BR decompression?
The MiG-25PDs radar is a pulse doppler radar as far as I can tell.
HOWEVER
It is a pulse doppler radar without proper look-down/shoot-down capabilities.
Pizza Delivery?