Others have flares. If they give them flares - they can move them on 11.0. They will be playable in downtiers at least.
AH-1W 11.0 —> 10.7
Want to get some input on this one. The AH-1W sits at 11.0 with 4 hardpoints cabable of carrying dumb rockets and 20mm gunpods on both pylons as well as assorted guided missiles on the outer pylons. While Hellfires, ARMs and, AIM-9Ls sounds good, the reality is you are extremely limited in what you can actually take to the battle field. For instance, you can take up to 8 Hellfires but to get just one easily flared A2A missile, you must sacrifice half your A2G missiles. Same goes for the ARMs (which are the worst ARMs in game). I believe moving it to 10.7 is feasible, especially given that the 2S6 is also at 10.7. Thoughts?
4 Likes
As per the suggestion five prototypes were under construction, so it would slot in as unfinished prototype.
3 Likes
You aren’t distinguishing between the Chinese F-104G and the others in your suggestion.
I said a scatter value. Didn’t say make it huge and a coin flip. Also there’s splash and assists for doing damage? Make mechanic around it like i literally said lololol
Also, instead of nitpicking micro details recognize an over all proof of concept. I suggested a very high level over view - not micro details and then suggested to not make it too RNG. You really could have put that together and saw the opportunities and not make up problems that didnt exist.
Arguing with someone over that is a bit nuts. Maybe take a minute and do some breathing exercises.
I wrote the BR, thought that’s enough.
In addition, I think that given how powerful some other 11.0 helicopters are, that should further strengthen the argument to move AH-1W to 10.7.
JDS Ujishima (MSC-655)
- Naval Arcade & Realistic Battles: 1.7 → 2.3
Reasoning: Extremely good survivability and armament allow it to wipe out motor boats with ease thanks to its 75 mm gun. It has highly efficient statistics because of this, and 1.0-1.3 boats struggle against her.
It should not have started at 1.7 BR. It’s the PC-451 situation all over again. It has the same armament as the PC-451, more or less, and should be moved up to 2.3, just like the PC-451.
The ho-ri that supposedly was left unfinished, retained the hull shape of the chi-ri. It didn’t have any sloped armour.
2 Likes
Su-25 /K 10.0 GRB —> 10.0 GRB
I was really surprised to see these moving down, given that they have countermeasures, all-aspect R-60s (not the greatest but still…) and, up to 6 laser guided missles (at 9.7!?!). These should remain at 10.0 so that at the very least, you have LAV-ADs and Roland systems countering the Frogfoots.
5 Likes
Vehicle: KV-1S/KV-1 (ZiS-5)/KV-1 m1942
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 4.3/4.7/4.7 —> 4.7/5.0/5.0
Reason: Incredibly strong tanks for their BRs with extremely good armor. If the Churchill VII will have higher BR, these tanks should also have a higher BRs.
1 Like
“But it’s hard to aim them!”, it’s not like most people just strafe using rocket pods and/or bombs lol
Whoever came up with the BR reductions is a comedian
1 Like
Yeah, the S-13OF rockets are pretty wicked
MiG-29SMT and MiG-29KR:
Add Kh-31AD/PD.
They’re subpar CAS at 12.3, Kh-31PD will help with this.
Plus AD will buff the plane for Nuclear Thunder.
1 Like
If i had to make a list of things id like to see
AH1W 10.7
Ah1G 7.0
UH1B 8.0
UH1C 8.3
Ah1F 9.0 (it doesn’t have AAMs, Sight tracking, or even countermeasures ffs it should not be the same BR as the Hinds who have ALL of that)
YAH64 10.7 cuz its a joke. why is it in the game?
Leave M26E5 at 6.7 where it belongs, other stuff is already going down to 6.3. so leaving it at 6.7 is a nerf. moving it upto 7.0 is insane and an unjust double nerf.
EFV 8.3 where it belongs cuz its trash
Dragoon 8.7 cuz its also trash
HSTVL 11.0 cuz its not good enough to be 12.0 (leave RDFLT where it is at 12.0 cuz its wildly better than the HSTVL anyway)
2S38 12.0 cuz its insanely good.
A7D/E 9.7 cuz its bad
A7K 10.0 cuz its just as slow/bad as the other A7s (people need to stop confusing the A7 with the F8. the F8 is fantastic. the A7 has HALF the engine power and 2x the weight, its a beached whale and is honestly terrible.)
XM800T 7.3 where it belongs, its no different from the weasel, so why is it so much higher? its already been nerfed multiple times over its life. a useless 20mm and no ATGMs at 8.0 is crazy work.
T95E1 7.7 where it belongs. its trash.
we need stock parts for vehicles at all BRs. remove it as an upgrade and make it universal.
Add Aim7D to F3H
Add Aim7E1 to F4C
Add Aim9L to F14A, Aim9M to F14B
Add Aim7P to the F14D
Add Harms and the New Guns mod to the A6E Tram.
Add missing JAGM IRs to AH1Z and AH60-DAP
Add JAGM-Fs to F18, F16, A10C, and F15E.
Add Heat APKWS and IR Proxi (flak) apwks to all aircraft & helis.
Add MDBA LG zunis to AH1Z and AV8B+
Add M833 to M60A3 and M1 Abrams. also fix M833 and give it the 433mm pen its suppose to have.
Add Type 4 HoTo 12cm, BR 1.0
Add Type 5 KeHo 47mm Light tank BR 2.7
Add Type 5 HoRu 47mm TD BR 2.3
Add Type 4 KeNu 57mm Light tank BR 1.3 (folder it after the HaGo since its a turret swapped HaGo anyway)
Add T30 GMC 1.0
Add M7 Priest 2.3
Add M12 GMC 3.0
Add M110A2 5.0
Add M109A7 8.0 (with M712 copperhead, and M982A1 LG ex-caliber, as well as VT shells and 2 Laze capable recon drones)
Add SDKFZ 124 Wesp 2.3
Add buddy lazing and an artillery spotting system that shows distance to marks from scout tanks.
2 Likes
America
EFV
Ground Realistic
9.0 → 8.3
The EFV is very sad at 9.0. It’s large, slow, poorly armed, poorly protected, can’t fire sideways or backwards, and struggles to side pen a good portion of tanks it faces.
Just for reference, the M3 Bradley at 8.3 is smaller, has TOWs, can fire in a 360° field around it, and has the same autocannon with slightly weaker sabots.
The EFV is far more fitting as an M3 Bradley sidegrade, getting a slightly better sabot in exchange for being worse at everything else.
5 Likes
Vehicle: ZSU-37-2
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 7.7 —> 8.0
Reason: This SPAA is a direct competitor to the PGZ88. The PGZ has better hull armor and its radar rotates 360 degrees, but it is inferior to the ZSU in mobility and size (the PGZ is much larger than the average tank, with a huge, unarmored turret that is easily destroyed). Since the PGZ likely receives a higher BR due to its anti-tank capabilities, a similar increase in armor rating would be appropriate for the ZSU (it has the same/even better anti-tank abilities due to belts and it’s size).
5 Likes
i think the main difference is that the PGZ88 has the Laser Range Finder and gets played by competitive players… that’s all
1 Like
That makes me sad but I understand that german/soviet vehicle will be always downtiered due to their mains skill issue.
That’s another Chi Nu II moment, also: )