What about the chinese 9.0 helis then lmao? the AH-1F is fine at its BR
1 Like
Vehicle: A6M5 Ko/A6M5 Otsu/A6M6c/A7M1 (NK9H)
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 5.7/5.7/5.3/5.3 —> 5.7/5.7/5.3/5.3
Reason: These planes don’t need to go up in BRs due to their very low speed even at their BR. Another nerf will make these planes unplayable against any opponent who even slightly understands what he’s doing. These planes are already absolutely useless against anyone who isn’t willing to engage them in a turn fight and just flies straight —a further moving up will make them completely useless and more of a ground attacker than fighter.
5 Likes
You’d think looking at the Wasp, Wessex and AH-1E would be enough to show that the AH-1F shouldn’t go down in BR
the fact that the chinese Gazelle is going up is stupid
3 Likes
Vehicle Phantom FG.1, FGR.2 probably the F-4j(UK)
Gamemode Air Realistic
BR change 12.0 → 11.7 or maybe probably 11.3
Reason: Both phantoms at 12.0 suffer so much with stock grind and after being spaded, they get uptier heavily to 13.0 most time while having a worse loadout, radar is super weak on its BR while other aircraft having much better radars. The Tornado F.3 at the same BR as the Phantom has PD HDN, TWD HDN, PDV HDN, and somewhat better missiles with Aim-9Ls and BOL. The Phantom only has PDV HDN and Search while having Aim-9Gs and Skyflash, it also faces F/A-18s, JH-7s, F-16s, Su-27s, Su-33, Mig-29s. It should go down in BR
5 Likes
You’re right, I shouldn’t have said that the sustainer is the only factor when it comes to it’s turning. Turning isn’t really a good term because both can technically pull similar amounts. That’s a mistake on my end.
What I later found out and have been completing look past ever since the spreadsheet has been released, is the PID. Correct me if I’m wrong:
- Proportional : how far off am I and how HARD do I need to correct myself
- Integral: how long have I been off and how much more PUSH to correct it.
- Derivative: how fast is the error closing and how MUCH less do I need apply these corrections (to prevent overshooting)
Here are the PID values of the two:
Hellfire: 0.011 | 0.035 | 0.0045
BA-9_: 0.0561 | 0.0996 | 0.0038
The BA-9 reacts 5x harder, 2.8x faster and brakes slightly less than the hellfire. this is not to say that the hellfire pulls less. It just reacts significantly less harder and slower.
It ultimately depends on how how far the target is.
Take a look at these two pictures. Notice the speed and distance at which these two are in (note: 55m launch altitude, 5095m range, stationary target)
True but I think it’s how you view it. Do you prefer hit probability or lethality. IMO, I prefer hit probability.
My guess is that it can carry more agms but a lot of helis will be very compressed after this BR change?
Vehicle: M4A3E2
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 5.7 —> 5.3
Reason: This tank is practically unplayable at its BR, constantly playing at the bottom of the bracket against much more popular BRs like 6.3-6.7. Against tanks higher in BR, it has no armor at all, and its gun is practically nonexistent. Considering the downgrade of the IS-2’s and early Tiger II (which penetrate it almost anywhere on the hull and are also very popular vehicles), this tank should be placed at 5.3 at max.
8 Likes
11.3… The Hawk 200 RDA 200 is at 11.3. Next thing you’ll tell me you think that one should go down to 10.7
These Phantoms should stay at 12.0, just like the US counterparts. The Tornado F.3 should move to 12.3 and there needs to be way more decompression in general
Are the matchups against 13.0s fair? Not really.
Would it be fair for 10.7s to fight these Phantoms? No.
what is the difference?
mbt that has no armor is effectively a light tank.
i just gotta say the BA-9 has dogshit damage in comparison to the hellfire
?
It has full apds (Wiesel has HE belt)
better mobility
somewhat trolly armour on occasion
stabiliser
and fights against Germany
It’s much better
type 99 GRB 7.3->7.0
if you are gonna lower almost every other spg without a laser down, might as well move type 99 down too. i dont know what makes it so special out of the bunch.
also hori getting removed means the lineup is getting broken up anyway.
personally i would have raised all of the laser spgs up instead, but i guess this works too.
type 75 can stay at 6.3 as its clearly superior than its counterparts that are going down.
Vehicle: Somua SM
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 7.7 —> 8.0 min
Reason: This tank has it all: decent armor, decent mobility, good shells, good gun depression/elevation angles, and an incredible reload time. This tank is better than almost any tank at 8.0, and yet somehow it’s at 7.7!
Its counterpart, the premium American T58, has worse shells (random) and better armor (which doesn’t help it as much at this BR). It’s at 8.7. The Somua SM should be at least 8.0, although, in my opinion, its fair BR should be 8.3.
3 Likes
I think it’s better for both tanks to have nerfed mobility/reload respectively but to stay at their current BR, than be as they were before but go up in BR tbh. Even with its reload nerf the T29 is one of the kings of 7.0. I very rarely see them do poorly
1 Like
Suggestion
Naval
Project 30 ships (Ognevoy, Bezuprechny, Smelyi)
4.3>4.7
A little less armour than Soobrazitelny (4.7) but otherwise very comperablenin in in performance.
Moving them up certainly won’t leave the Russian 4.3 lacking as the other ships at the BR are more than capable in their own right as they use the same. B-13 main guns but differ in detail such as layout and Secondaries.
1 Like
The british Phantom is a deboned version of the F-4J, different engines, Similar Aim-7E-2 just british
At 11.7 should be fine without suffering so much it may be Us export but it doesnt have HMD its radar is weaker and it doesnt have 6 radar missiles like the F-4J. Sure 11.3 theres already the hawk but at 11.7 should be fine for the Phantom its just a weaker version of the F-4J with 11.3 loadout, the Tornado would be either stay at 12.0 or somehow moved to 12.3 with DL and IOG missiles. Its performance is bad i wont win a dogfight with a hornet unless the hornet is braindead and uses the funny cobra button to crash and loose all of its speed
2 Likes
One of the most insane statements i have read in a very long time.
When i play my UK P-47 (BR 3.7) on a Pacific map vs a JP team i am untouchable as below 5.3 there is not a single fighter JP that can catch me. Applying your logic kills basically every US prop in the game as they have to rely on their speed advantage.
Think about it and you see the flaw in your logic.
-
The whole idea of building jets was to get fighters faster - and if you would have played the 50mm Me 262 A-1 / U4 more than 2 times in Air RB you would not have written such nonsense.
-
Undertiered in wt terms means that a plane allows way too easy kills for average players - and flying a German jet requires a lot of experience to get kills without playing suicidal - the statistical data show that the plane sucks in an A2A role as fighter.
-
Even your wording “passively” is repulsive - based on this every aircraft which requires some brainpower to make it work has to be played passive as you need to pick up speed and/or alt in order to get an energy advantage before you engage.
-
The 50mm HE round has no tracer and the ap round is useless if you don’t hit the pilot(s) or an engine. Unfortunately any even remotely aware player is able to see you coming - so i gave up flying it after 40 Air RB matches as i faced countless hits on enemies (including BIs) without getting kills no matter if i scored HE or AP hits - and even for pillbox farming the shells produce way to much hits.
-
The 162 at 6.0 is just 5% slower and is the way better pick at this BR as you are (correct flown) untouchable whilst you have working guns and can turn fight to a certain degree.
1 Like
Suggestion
Naval
Russian Leningrad class - Leningrad
4.3>4.7
More main guns than Soobrazitelny at 4.7, and very similar secondary/AA. She is also faster and carries more crew and could be considered to the better ship of the two despite its current lower BR.
The other Leningrad class ‘Moskva’ may retain 4.3 at this time as has much weaker secodaries lacking the multiple 37mm mounts) and should also lack HE-VT as she sank in 1941 before these were invented)
2 Likes
son, beside khorne asking you why should R-77 be at the same BR as non R-77 MiG-29s, Ill go with migoons assesment of the plane capabilites rather than yours 😭
1 Like