Is the Ho-Ri removal going to work the same as the removal of the R2Y2 jets? Where you will own the vehicle just by putting at least one research point into the vehicle or do you have to actually purchase the vehicle to own it?
yes, all the vehicle removals have worked the same way.
1 point in research is enough
thank you
How you figure the filler does not make a difference?
FYI - the Jumbo 75mm gun at 5.7 would have similar effectiveness of the Churchill ammo at 5.0
And… still no BR change for the Falcon spaa. LOLOLOL.
or maybe this TKX (p) should be lowered down the br in the same way as the type 90? Have you thought about that? None of these tanks deserves 12.0
Other 11.7 tanks:
M1A1 – equal or superior in every respect except reload speed.
Challenger – falls short only in mobility and reload speed.
As for the Arietes… I’m all for it, provided they all have the DM53 round taken away and get moved from 11.7 down to 11.0–11.3, and from 12.3 down to 11.7.
1 Like
1 Like
Yes, this would make it more realistic. Then we could have a 1944 vintage Early A30 Challenger with worse armour and no APDS at 4.7.
1 Like
F-14A IRIAF at 13.7 is a non sense
A plane from 1974 facing 4.0 / 4.5 gen fighters
With a very limited radar, very limited missile, very limited countermeasures
You guys should give away some GE for those that have it and remove it from the game once and for all.
Cause It’s already unplayble .
We know the only people getting themselves killed in F-14s these days are the premium players—GJ’s little darlings—which is why they pull this shit.
Vehicle: F-16CM Block 52 PoBIT
Mode: Air Realistic
Change: 14.3 → 14.0
Reasoning:
The F-16CM PoBIT lacks any real ability to compete at its own BR due to its lackluster speed, dogfight performance, and missile count. The only redeeming factor of the PoBIT is an AESA radar, except the majority of planes at 14.3 have an AESA radar, and a decent number still have better radars than the PoBIT.
Similarly, many 14.0 or even 13.7 aircraft hold significant advantages over the PoBIT in both an ARB environment and in a one on one engagement.
1 Like
Vehicle: F-16V Block 72
Mode: Air Realistic
Change: 14.3 → 14.0
Reasoning:
Same as with my F-16CM PoBIT reply, the F-16V has zero ability to compete at its own BR since it is significantly lacking in almost every aspect compared to its competition at 14.3, and many 13.7 or 14.0 aircraft are superior in both an ARB environment and in a 1v1 secnario.
Updated suggestion. Thank you for bringing this up.
1 Like
AIR REALISTIC
Ki-100 4.0 → 4.0 (no change)
Currently Ki-100 is a very well-balanced plane. It is average in most of its capabilities, with exception of turn which is decent and above average, but nothing special. Much worse than turn capability of Ki-61-Is.
It should not go up, as it is already balanced.
AIR REALISTIC
Ki-61-II 4.7 → 4.0
Ki-61-II is a pretty bad plane. It is heavier than Ki-100 and not much faster. Much worse than Spitfire Mk9 which is now being moved to 4.7, with worse turn performance, roll rate, climb rate, and top speed.
1 Like
Vehicle:TAM
Mode: GB
Change: 9.0 → 8.7
Reasoning: it’s a basically leoa1a1
Vehicle:AMX30 B2 and Brenus
Mode: GB
Change: 8.7→ 8.3
Reasoning: they are not equal to the leoA1A1 and t-62 and they lack stab. I would swap their thermals for a stab any day of the week
Vehicle:STB, type74 (c)
Mode: GB
Change: 8.3 → 8.0
Reasoning: why this tank with no heatfs worse reverse gear of the leo1a1 is still at 8.3?? the Olifant with apfsds and t55a they sit at the same BR with way better round selection, better survivability and reverse gear. the STB has not heatfs only apds. type74 has heatfs but it’s not in a better position either
Vehicle:AMX30 (1972)
Mode: GB
Change: 8.0 → 7.7
Reasoning: It has only HEAT round, no stab who is this tank comparable to the obj906 with stab and 4s reload is crazy to me. there is no reason why this tank needs to fight the 9.0 pretty soon all the leos 1a5
Vehicle:t55a
Mode: GB
Change: 8.3 → 8.7
Reasoning: It’s the natural enemy of the LeoA1A1 and they should share the same BR. Most of the fights are city maps anyway so they are a good match up exactly like the t62 at 8.7
Vehicle:AMX30 B2 and Brenus
Mode: GB
Change: 8.7→ 8.3
Reasoning: they are not equal to the leoA1A1 and t-62
Vehicle:Chieftain mk3/5
Mode: GB
Change: 8.7 → 8.3
Reasoning: The hull is a huge weakspot and the turret armor won’t stop heatfs, apds or apfsds
they are slow and you can’t move from point A to point B without getting shot and die by faster vehicles
the Olifant mk1 at 8.3 is a superior tank thanks to the apfsds there is no doubt
2 Likes
Vehicle:ZTZ88B and ZTZ88A
Mode: GB
Change: 9.0→ 8.7
Reasoning: They are slightly better of the t55a that sits at 8.3. they are basically on pair with leoa1a1 when it comes to firepower and mobility, they still have that -5 gun depression
105 guns with same pen as the leoA1A1
there is no reason not to have them following tha leo variant
LCM(6) Zippo
- Naval Arcade & Realistic Battles: 2.3 → 2.0
Reasoning: This boat is performing poorly due to its limited gun traverse and its tendency to rock, throwing off the aim as a natural consequence of its low freeboard. In addition, it is an extremely slow boat that has a difficult time influencing the outcome of a match. Its limited gun elevation also makes it an easy target for CAS aircraft.
2 Likes
This guy loves BR compression
I don’t think it needs to go down. It’s winrate over the past 3 months has been 50-52%. While it also has one of the best KD’s of all the Panzer IV’s, only beaten by the F1.
The LeoA1A1 deserved for a long time to go down to 8.7 that’s a fact compared to anything around his BR
And some tanks deserve to be raised and lowered. right now I just focused on the ones who needs to be lowered but we can all agree that are a lot of tanks that deserve a BR increase