Ground RB - SA.342M Gazelle : 9.7 > 9.3
While it’s a good improvement over the SA.341F Gazelle, with more missiles, it does on the counterpart lose it’s gun, and i don’t think it’s 9.7 worthy. It is still a very light helicopter that die very easily.
This!
The AMX-30S DCA was only held up by it functioning as a pseudo IFV, it’s lost that ability now and lacks any of the tools of its counterparts like stabilisers or a decent radar. No reason not to drop it.
Another BR changes without any sort of addressing the mess that is 12.3-14.0
Vehicle: tornado IDS sle
Change: 12.3 → 14.3
Reason: I’m salty germans got better tornado than Italy
Does anybody have a idea why bombers are getting lower BR in ground battles but never lower brs in air battles
Vehicle: M26 Pershings
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 6.7 —> 6.3 (6.0 would be better)
Reason: M26 lacks mobility and necessary armor, and can be penetrated from the front by lower BR tanks like Tigers.The M26 also lacks sufficient firepower in the current situation.
I request you cancel this reload change for the Stuk/Kwk 40s, at the very least for the Panzer IVs
These vehicles already have tremendous firepower for their BR considering they use APHE, a 5 second reload puts it faster than the Russian 76 and at the same speed as the 75mm M2/M3, whilst having considerably better penetration.
Naval RB - La Combattante (Coastal Fleet, not the Bluewater Fleet one) : 3.7 > 3.3
This ship isnt armoured at all and fight a lot of frigates it can’t do much against, the guns aren’t good enough to damage them, and the missile is too slow and doesn’t do enough damage. Would be a good idea to either drop it’s BR to 3.3, or give it the SS.12 missile it can use.
AIR REALISTIC
Yak-3U 5.7 → 6.3
Outstanding acceleration and energy retention; very good turn rate especially sustained; fantastic guns; very comfortable top speed capable of outspeeding many fighters it will also outturn, putting them in an impossible situation.
Hey, as mentioned in the text:
They are being removed now as other vehicles have already been added to expand the Japanese tree.
I thonk Morvran should get banned from suggesting BR changes as it will only make the game worse
BMPT has shown it’s a fairly mediocre vehicle at 11.7.
Naval RB - Bretagne : 6.7 > 6.3
It is not much different from the Lorraine, the main difference is that the ship have one more turret, but it does not warrant a BR increase. It is one of the worst 6.7 battleship and would benefit to drop to 6.3 to be more competitive.
Vehicle: Leopard A1A1 (L/44)
Mode: RB
Change: 9.3 → 9.0
Reason: sure, it has the 120mm gun over the 1A5 which are going down to 9.0, but the 120mm gun isnt that of a Improvement that it would justify a 0.3 diffrent as DM33 is depending on the Angle/Range better than the 120mm DM13
FV4005
6.3 → 6.0 (No difference from proposed)
How is the ki-87 going to 5.3 but the zeros are 6.0!?
No change in Ground RB for YAK-9T/K, no change for Pucara in ground RB?
What vehicles???
Let’s start addressing the elephant in the room (questionable planned BR changes in the spreadsheets).
Reasoning: I fail to see the justification for moving the A6M5 Ko to 6.0. To me, this seems to be an unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Ko, at its undeserved 5.7 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability as its main strength, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
why gaijin complete ignoring 11.7 - 10.0 tanks?