British RB Ground BR’s:
- Centurion Mk 3: 7.7 down to 7.3. It’s overshadowed by the Centurion 5/1, “Action X”, Caernarvon, and Conqueror. There’s no reason to take it over these vehicles. Just compare it to the FV4202 and it’s actually quite similar.
Seems strange that the 20-Pdr Centurions now have a slower reload than the 90mm.
British RB Ground BR’s:
- Falcon: 8.3 down to 7.7. It’s terrible compared to the Chieftain Marksman. Worse firepower, worse radar, worse armour, and it’s not even more mobile. The only thing it has over the Marksman is its smaller size. After removing the APDS it’s dropped massively in win rate and KD. It’s time.
British RB Ground BR’s:
- Vijayanta: 8.3 down to 8.0. This thing really is just a worse Vickers MBT Mk 1. Without the LRF there’s no reason for a slower vehicle to be 0.3 higher than the TT counterpart even with the HEATFS.
Doesn’t its APHE still shred tanks like Gepard’s?
Vehicle: Su-30MK2 AMV (USSR), Su-30MKK (China)
Gamemode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 13.3 → 13.7
Reason: Despite having more Missiles and a HMCS contrary to western Equivalents on its BR (F-16A ADF) it sits on a lower BR.
It’s basically a Wirbelwind with worse guns, but shot way up in BR for having proper armor. That armor certainly counts for something, but not to the extent that it deserves the current BR.
Its only real downside is that it has near 0 chance against tanks but against planes it’s practically immune unless bombed. Most people just aren’t used to the rather low velocity 20s on it though.
Ran out of likes but i most certainly agree with everything here, hope some of these come through. One thing ill mention is the tortoise is missing quite a bit of armour so maybe if they finally decide to fix that it could stick at its br or maybe even move up if finally given its apds round. Would be really nice to bring with all of its fixes implemented.
If they fix the armour and give it the APDS staying at 6.7 would be fine. I will edit the post to include the armour bug report. Forgot about that.
already put RP into ho-ri production thank god
If you had any reading comprehension you would notice he said previously, like how the 2s38 was 9.3 when it came and the bmp 2m was the sam, maybe even lower cant quite remember rn. Both were horrendous to face and the same can be said for the bmpt.
And im not sorry to say but most people who defend said vehicles just want to keep them low so they can have fun while ruining it for everyone else.
I know people who play russia who are on average better than the usual lot who plays it and they say the same things i do, most of the time they are under tiered and usually hand held more so than other nations.
Why is the T26E5 up in BR but not the Tiger II H???
They shred anything light, but so do the ZSUs at 7.0/7.3 Or the Wiesel 1A4 at 7.3 or BTR at 7.3
Etc etc
Still shooting myself in the foot for not taking the time to get some into the panther 2 and tiger 2 105 back in the day… It wasnt like i was even that far off, i had simply gotten bored of grinding germany. ESPECIALLY with how bad the teams were and still are.
Vehicle: F-5A(G)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 10.7 —> 10.0
Reason: It’s essentially a regular F-5A just with aim-9L’s and the unique but not great penguin missile.
Im honestly fine with them removing its aphe if it actually got moved down to 7.7.
Nords on an f5 platform are quire scary mind you, its why im thinking ground around those brs are gonna get a little feisty with f5as going as low as they are.
Well yea except it has the least pen and velocity and the most armour compared to those.
I wouldnt exactly call the Falcon a tanky vehicle though. No more than any other light tank. Its not exactly a low BR version of the BMPT.
And are you saying the Falcon has weaker guns than those?
Missiles.