Logical tech-tree adjustements for France:
Switch places between the F-100D and the Alpha Jet E in the french tech tree, respectively a fighter in the attacker line and an attacker in the fighter line… Moreover it seems logical to me for the super saber to be after an other sabre and before the F-8 which is literally based on the F-100.
The french (dutch) sea fury needs to be moved in the benelux line of the tech tree.
How am I lying? I said the vehicle was OP, I never said I was good. Anyone worth half their salt in this game will agree all 4 of those vehicles are blatantly overpowered. Every CC I’ve seen discuss them have said they’re brokenly OP, just cuz I have bad stats with them, doesnt mean they arent OP lmao.
That is also a reason I listed. He is saying it comes down to teams which I do not believe to be the case.
a vehicule being op mean that a brainless kid can easly get a 2 K/d.
for exemple the bmpt at 10.3
I just wish more of the player base would push for decompression among other things. I think it would solve a lot. We argue on the forums instead of working together to create change. We are stronger as a group.
It is, you can’t be having very high or low winrates for a plane if they’re always on both sides, since again they will average out to around half or 50%.
I do own them, hello
Vehicle: Yak-3U
Gamemode: Air Realistic Battless
BR Change: 5.7 - 6.0
Reason:
Ever since the Spitfire Lf MkIX got its BR raised, It became an incredibly oppressive 5.7 fighter. The Yak-3U counters if not the entire German Tech Tree.
Only a few US planes like the F4U-4B, F2G, and the P-51H, (which sits 0.7 higher), P-38K (by means of conserving energy the whole game.) can match by lieu of top speed and energy retention.
In the British Tech Tree, while most spitfires out-turn the Yak-3u easily, they do not have the endurance nor its ability to produce energy. The Spitfire F MkXIV Griffons are not competitive enough to handle a Yak-3U
Japanese props are in the same league as the British props, while they do out-dogfight the Yak-3U, they are still incredibly slower.
In an ARB match, the Yak-3U in its BR, controls the match easily, and I don’t even want to talk about trying to fight it in an uptiered 4.7 prop.
Ok this must be red enough
Red text is moderator only
See my previous post. I’m done arguing. Agree to disagree.
i dont.
but he made them sounf the bmpt 10.3 that i dont even need to own them to see how bad his statement is
I always wondered. Couldn’t they just disable certain font colors for certain user types?
F-117 has a camera
So why would anyone prefer the one over the other
For example; American mains also have two tech tree Phantoms on either sides of their trees. F-4E and F-4J. But instead of making them identical to their 1980s upgrade variation, they made the F-4E Vietnam War era spec to keep it at 11.3, and the F-4J post-Vietnam to keep it at a higher BR with better avionics and weapons
What’s the point if British tech tree players have two identical Phantoms which plays the exact same at the exact same BR, with the only difference being one is carrier capable (only use in Sim and NT mode)
Vehicle: Yak-3U
Gamemode: Air Realistic Battless
BR Change: 4.7 - 5.3
Reason:
The F8F-1 is a text-book definition of what seal-clubbing is, ever since Gaijin “fixed” its rudder-stiffening at high speeds. It became more oppressive than the Yak-3U is. It’s FASTER than ALL fighters at its BR, and has the engine power and means to out-energy ALL props it commonly fights.
Though it does lose engine power past 3km and majorly changes its performance at 5km, most props at 4.7 range do not really possess the capacity the F8F has, in spite of its meager 4x .50 cals, they’re reliable enough to set fighters on fire in a few bursts.
Furthermore, I can’t list down a single fighter at 3.7-4.7 below that can reliably pin down an F8F that doesn’t willfully handicap itself. The F8F can and will win matches easily.
Vehicle:
Gamemode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 12.7 —> 12.3
Reason: Despite the Israeli Netz having a better Flight model and better Missiles, as well as more CMs, it is on a lower BR in Air Sim. In Air RB, both the Netz and the F-16As are 12.3, so a Change for air sim would be possible to match its capabilities. Additionally the F-16A lacks an HMCS and radar missiles, considering the MiG-29A is on 12.3 aswell.
You’d think people would want decompression, but instead we have dozens of people asking for more compression because usually they focus on single vehicles that they think should go down in BR, rather than looking at the whole picture
ok i couldn’t sit by any longer once i seen that the t20 over performing was brought up. why does gaijin feel the need to have to manipulate every aspect of gameplay? why cant player skill be the reason for a loss or win and not the nerfing or buffing of a war machine based on player usages? the black prince is never played and has a br that makes it completely unplayed but there it sits or the elephant that had outrageous repair cost because someone at the office hated it. stop it just stop it! this has gone on long enough.
