my T58 8.7 - 9.0 so Gaijin can bring it up in ranks
2 Likes
Do you also watch Maverick every week?
Straight to being rude, very well done, and it only took one response too.
I just don’t think it should warm you 12km away or less in some cases, and that’s it. For the record I don’t think it’s OP, but people massively undersell fakours and I won’t cry if it goes up, nor will I ask for it to go down.
I have the IRIAF aced and spaded
I have 5 top tier nations in air rb and am a very good air player.
I know what I’m talking about
4 Likes
That’s a singular track-link, in comparison, the Ho-Ri II as we see in-game is much more feasible than the O-I heavy tank. But nonetheless would be a fun vehicle to have in-game even considering these caveats… 
Centurion Mk.10, Strv 101
8.0 → 8.0 (no change)
Add L52A1 APDS (Slpprj m/66)
They are not all that excellent at 8.0, adding a better APDS round will help this
10 Likes
Interesting to see, the main glass cannons to defend from the 3.7 Tanks in an full uptier. Nice.
1 Like
how does BR changes become about skill issues lol
It’s all I can say to you, I’m not that good at air but I am competent enough to see the giant white tree branches of smoke in the sky and see if one of them is tracking me
1 Like
AMX-32 105 [GRB] : 9.3->9.0
If the Leo 1A5 goes down at 9.0, the AMX-32 105 should do the same as it is literally heavier, less mobile, and has worse firepower than this latter.
11 Likes
Vehicle: T26E5
BR: 7.0 → 6.7
Gamemode: GRB
Reason: The T26E5 might be a beast in its Battlr Rating, but is it good at 7.0? Sure a downtierd 7.0 Game is no problem, but uptierd to 7.7? Facing Is3, 4? HEAT schells from almost all Tanks at those BR? The T26E5 wont survive that Battle Rating. It still has that 90mm canon with a max pen of 185mm at 100 meters from a 10degree angle.
7 Likes
Vehicle: Prem su 30 for russia and china.
BR change: 13.3 > 13.7
Reason: It dominates the br bracket and is a cut above anything else at the br, they should have been moved up months ago.
7 Likes
B-66 is killing naval AB at 8.7–9.0, please raise its AB BR to 9.3–9.7
1 Like
I believe it should be 9.3 instead since it only has 2 ready to fire missiles instead of 4 and a 25mm which is inferior to the twin 35mm on the gepard.
2 Likes
t-92: 7.0>6.7
Litterally had a mental breakdown because of how bad this thing is stock, there is no situation where a 76mm gun should have APCR stock at a BR where almost nothing it faces can not be damaged by it.
3 Likes
Vehicle: Su-30MK2/MKK
Gamemode: Air Simulator Battles
BR Change: 13.3 —> 13.7
Reason: It currently sits at the same BR as the Su-27 and Su-33 and making every 13.3 match completely onesided alongside the Su-34’s.
11 Likes
Five prototypes were under construction by the end of the war.
The issue for the Ho-Ri was never that it was only a mockup, but that the specific version we got in game is based on an entirely different design from the final Ho-Ri, and that even for what it was the “Prototype” was so inaccurate that it was fiction more than paper, while the “Production” was intentionally fictional because no real design was enough for what they wanted top tier at the time to be.
Go read the suggestion on the real Ho-Ri if you want, it’d be a great vehicle to add now that the in-game one is being removed. It could either be a new vehicle for the techtree, or they could even remodel the “Prototype” to be more accurate and sell it again in a realistic form like they did for the CV90105
5 Likes
“But Su-27SM”
"Solution:
Move Su-27SM to 14.0 where it will be the best 14.0 anyways
5 Likes
Yeah this takes me back to the old days in 2014/15 tring to grind out the shermans in US. Enemy could just camp hill tops with their higher velocity guns and the sherman couldnt touch them.
Super discouraging experience.
like I’ve said this can perform at 13.7 but pls snail if u do this give f-18c early 13.3 and aim9M or aim120s