“But Su-27SM”
"Solution:
Move Su-27SM to 14.0 where it will be the best 14.0 anyways
5 Likes
Yeah this takes me back to the old days in 2014/15 tring to grind out the shermans in US. Enemy could just camp hill tops with their higher velocity guns and the sherman couldnt touch them.
Super discouraging experience.
like I’ve said this can perform at 13.7 but pls snail if u do this give f-18c early 13.3 and aim9M or aim120s
Now, I am going to post additional BR changes not listed on the current spreadsheets.
USS Tucumcari
- Naval Arcade & Realistic Battles: 3.0 → 2.7
Reasoning:
USS Tucumcari is essentially identical to the USS Flagstaff in terms of hull gameplay and armament, except that the Flagstaff can switch from a 40 mm gun to a 152 mm gun. The Flagstaff also has more armor, a larger crew, and a slightly smaller profile. USS Tucumcari currently struggles against more advanced boats at BR 3.0–4.0 that outgun the Tucumcari.
Therefore, if the Flagstaff is receiving a BR reduction, then the USS Tucumcari, like its sibling boat, must also be moved from 3.0 to 2.7.
7 Likes
Good but can be better
Why is it 2 times in the list?
1 Like
Where are economy change/reductions? The last one has been too long ago and were promised to regularly be done.
It is, in fact, not “all but confirmed”.
Most sources on the OI dispute whether or not it was built, what it’s true specifications were, or what happened to it. There are also no pictures of it, complete or incomplete. Just blueprints.
Pretty much ALL we have is this one track link and that doesn’t comfirm a whole lot, IF it even is the OI’s link at all.
Unless you’ve got something that the rest of us don’t.
1 Like
WTM version and TT version
1 Like
Assuming:
- There isnt any clouds in the way
- You arent busy dealing with something else, like defending against other incoming missiles or dogfighting someone
Assuming:
- you have an RWR that can give you that level of warning (a few even at 13.0 cant do that)
- you caught the momentary F14 RWR ping under maybe a load of other contacts all hitting you at once.
in a 1v1, F-14s even ones with F-90s are easy to deal with. The tricky bit comes when its 16v16, and there is a lot going on.
2 Likes
Oh, i thought thats just a skin.
Vehicle: F16AJ
Mode: Air Rb
Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Sitting at the same BR than other planes that offer, better radars, a lot more missiles, better missiles, more CM, … its probably the worst 12.7 plane that is currently out there.
You can either change its BR down to 12.3 or as its a fictional variant of a plane anyways, you could take the freedom and add something like the Aam3 to it or even make it a Fox 3 platform with the Aam4 for a hypothetical upgrade that the Japanese did to the F16 which would be a very interesting concept. Similar to the 13.3 F16s
7 Likes
Grb
M26 6.7 → 6.3
Its very lackluster armor profile for what it faces leaves it stuck in an ambush playstyle similar to light tanks, however its also not particularly mobile even for a medium tank leaving you particularly vulnerable when you give away your position and specially if you fail to kill them in a single shot
11 Likes
Ground RB
Sherman III/IV
3.7 → 4.0
This thing has excellent armour, and the best mobility among shermans in the game, and lack the hull MG weakspot
this BR increase would also bring it up to the same BR as its TT counterparts
19 Likes
Ground Realistic BR
BuccaneerS.2B
10.3—>10.3
At that time, in order to keep this plane at 10.3, you guys drastically nerfed the AJ168 missile—the magnification was only 3.53x, speed was reduced, and the explosive yield was significantly decreased (88.5KG → 53.5KG). The target lock distance went down from 12km to 6km. The man-in-the-loop is interesting, but it feels like chocolate-flavored poop. Apart from the man-in-the-loop mechanism, everything else is useless. Going to 10.7 is really unreasonable, and it’s very different from the J22M1A. No HD thermal imaging, one less man-in-the-loop missile, and the missile’s seeker performance is hugely different (3.53X vs. 8.1–24X). Could this really be only a 0.3 BR difference?
5 Likes
NOPE!, brother give it up this thing is not 12.3 worthy. Not in the slightest…
GBT 155
GRB
7.0 → 6.7
After the shell velocity of the GBT 155 was silently nerfed in the Heavy Cavalry update, from its original 940m/s to 684m/s (Same as the M109A1), it should get a decrease in its BR, now that its effective performance is worse.
Another argument for the decrease to its BR, is that you are decreasing the BR of the AuF1 in the same update, with the AuF1 having a shell velocity of 810m/s. The reloads of the two vehicles are also quite similar, 7.5s for AuF1 and 6.5s for the GBT 155 with aced crew.
3 Likes
Moving down the Tiger 2 to 6.3 as if the 85mm can pen it frontally is such BS
B52 8.7 - 10.0 with actually useful loadout and jamming
Welp, every tank that got APHE is now dead (especially the Churchill). Tho the Cromwell V might be good, as now there is room for a Sherman V in the tree.
What do you mean the Hummal is going down!?!?!? That thing steamrolled teams when I fought it.
And once again I’m pulling my hair out at seeing the name C2A1 (the name of a FAL variant). What’s sadder is that the file name for the vehicle is correct. If only Gaijin had it so names of the operator nation took priority. (related bug report) Community Bug Reporting System
3 Likes