Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Vehicle: T26E5
BR: 7.0 → 6.7
Gamemode: GRB
Reason: The T26E5 might be a beast in its Battlr Rating, but is it good at 7.0? Sure a downtierd 7.0 Game is no problem, but uptierd to 7.7? Facing Is3, 4? HEAT schells from almost all Tanks at those BR? The T26E5 wont survive that Battle Rating. It still has that 90mm canon with a max pen of 185mm at 100 meters from a 10degree angle.

4 Likes

Vehicle: Prem su 30 for russia and china.

BR change: 13.3 > 13.7

Reason: It dominates the br bracket and is a cut above anything else at the br, they should have been moved up months ago.

7 Likes

B-66 is killing naval AB at 8.7–9.0, please raise its AB BR to 9.3–9.7

1 Like

I believe it should be 9.3 instead since it only has 2 ready to fire missiles instead of 4 and a 25mm which is inferior to the twin 35mm on the gepard.

2 Likes

t-92: 7.0>6.7

Litterally had a mental breakdown because of how bad this thing is stock, there is no situation where a 76mm gun should have APCR stock at a BR where almost nothing it faces can not be damaged by it.

1 Like

Vehicle: Su-30MK2/MKK
Gamemode: Air Simulator Battles
BR Change: 13.3 —> 13.7
Reason: It currently sits at the same BR as the Su-27 and Su-33 and making every 13.3 match completely onesided alongside the Su-34’s.

11 Likes

Five prototypes were under construction by the end of the war.

The issue for the Ho-Ri was never that it was only a mockup, but that the specific version we got in game is based on an entirely different design from the final Ho-Ri, and that even for what it was the “Prototype” was so inaccurate that it was fiction more than paper, while the “Production” was intentionally fictional because no real design was enough for what they wanted top tier at the time to be.

Go read the suggestion on the real Ho-Ri if you want, it’d be a great vehicle to add now that the in-game one is being removed. It could either be a new vehicle for the techtree, or they could even remodel the “Prototype” to be more accurate and sell it again in a realistic form like they did for the CV90105

4 Likes

“But Su-27SM”

"Solution:

Move Su-27SM to 14.0 where it will be the best 14.0 anyways

4 Likes

Yeah this takes me back to the old days in 2014/15 tring to grind out the shermans in US. Enemy could just camp hill tops with their higher velocity guns and the sherman couldnt touch them.

Super discouraging experience.

like I’ve said this can perform at 13.7 but pls snail if u do this give f-18c early 13.3 and aim9M or aim120s

Now, I am going to post additional BR changes not listed on the current spreadsheets.

USS Tucumcari

  • Naval Arcade & Realistic Battles: 3.02.7

Reasoning:

USS Tucumcari is essentially identical to the USS Flagstaff in terms of hull gameplay and armament, except that the Flagstaff can switch from a 40 mm gun to a 152 mm gun. The Flagstaff also has more armor, a larger crew, and a slightly smaller profile. USS Tucumcari currently struggles against more advanced boats at BR 3.0–4.0 that outgun the Tucumcari.

Therefore, if the Flagstaff is receiving a BR reduction, then the USS Tucumcari, like its sibling boat, must also be moved from 3.0 to 2.7.

5 Likes

Good but can be better

image
Why is it 2 times in the list?

1 Like

Where are economy change/reductions? The last one has been too long ago and were promised to regularly be done.

It is, in fact, not “all but confirmed”.
Most sources on the OI dispute whether or not it was built, what it’s true specifications were, or what happened to it. There are also no pictures of it, complete or incomplete. Just blueprints.

Pretty much ALL we have is this one track link and that doesn’t comfirm a whole lot, IF it even is the OI’s link at all.

Unless you’ve got something that the rest of us don’t.

WTM version and TT version

Assuming:

  1. There isnt any clouds in the way
  2. You arent busy dealing with something else, like defending against other incoming missiles or dogfighting someone

Assuming:

  1. you have an RWR that can give you that level of warning (a few even at 13.0 cant do that)
  2. you caught the momentary F14 RWR ping under maybe a load of other contacts all hitting you at once.

in a 1v1, F-14s even ones with F-90s are easy to deal with. The tricky bit comes when its 16v16, and there is a lot going on.

2 Likes

Oh, i thought thats just a skin.

Vehicle: F16AJ
Mode: Air Rb
Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Sitting at the same BR than other planes that offer, better radars, a lot more missiles, better missiles, more CM, … its probably the worst 12.7 plane that is currently out there.
You can either change its BR down to 12.3 or as its a fictional variant of a plane anyways, you could take the freedom and add something like the Aam3 to it or even make it a Fox 3 platform with the Aam4 for a hypothetical upgrade that the Japanese did to the F16 which would be a very interesting concept. Similar to the 13.3 F16s

5 Likes

Grb
M26 6.7 → 6.3

Its very lackluster armor profile for what it faces leaves it stuck in an ambush playstyle similar to light tanks, however its also not particularly mobile even for a medium tank leaving you particularly vulnerable when you give away your position and specially if you fail to kill them in a single shot

8 Likes