Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

I would prefer this. Those other Firefly’s would represent 1944 versions without APDS. While Gaijin could copy-paste the Italian Sherman IC Hybrid and give it to the British, because it is a British vehicle, and use it to represent a 1945 version with APDS.

2 Likes

only the F16V block 20 and not 72 should go down in 14.0

the lack of engine power is a big issue and they are not the same.


2 Likes

@MiGoon_Fox-3

Yeah it fine your playing against inexperience player that just bought a premium and have no clue of what they doing or understand any function of top tier. I looked up the Aim120A/B they are the similar all around almost i wasnt aware of it but atleast let it have the C-5 model for better long distance for the lack of amount. SU in the right hand can shot down all of the f16 missile and still have enough to keep spamming at the f16 with no need to evade that my issue with it

until they agree to giving it more missile to carry it need to go down in br either way AESA is good but it wont matter if we have AWACS that scan the air space its all about data linking and tracing is similar to me just like the older model. this game dont really show how effective the AESA is compared to the older radars

Ka52 can easily be shoot down especially with all the new SAMs unless it get some type of jamming system but it barely been played ever since the ircm on the MI28 is introduce with fire and forget missiles they are on to different level so Ka52 11.7. Tell me this who wins Ka52 or Pantsir

The devs are so lazy it’s genuinely infuriating. Do they even know what a Zero is? WHY is it going to 6.0??? WHERE is the official response despite the many protests here?

And for some reason, they can’t be asked to make the Ho-Ri as it was intended. What is happening to this game?

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

5 Likes

Is adding the Ho-Ri as intended, for which the unique gun was built and tested, not going to be considered?

3 Likes
Help me

IMG_5680

Vehicle: Yak-3U / Yak-3 (VK-107)
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 5.7 —> 6.0
Reason: If the LF Mk9 Spitfires last BR Change and the Zeros this major update are so strong that they require being 6.0, then why isnt the strongest aircraft at 5.7 also moving up in the form of the Yak-3. It consistantly outperforms the Spitifre and Zero.

8 Likes

Now let’s talk about hit rates.
With top-attack AGMs like the Hellfire and the AKD-9=BA-9, continuous firing allows the second and third rounds—which have already established a stable trajectory—to hit the target at an earlier stage, even if the first round misses.
Since the Apache can carry as many as 16 of these without sacrificing slots for AAMs, the hit rate of a single missile isn’t a major concern.
The Hellfire is an AGM that, if even a single round hits a tank, will almost certainly disable it or destroy it in a single strike.

Furthermore, this payload capacity and firepower directly impact combat endurance and kill counts. Even based on specs alone, the difference in firing rate between the Apache and the Z-19 is twofold; however, since high-damage AGMs like the Hellfire can aim for a kill with the first shot, the actual disparity is even greater.

Furthermore, this is an issue inherent to helicopters in general: the broken ARH SAM meta currently present in BR 12.7 is causing significant trouble for helicopters from BR 11.7 onward that lack LDIRCM, so this mere 0.3 difference makes a truly massive impact. If we’re going to have to face these monsters while being limited to just four of these underpowered AGMs at a practical level, this update will truly be the worst kind of meddling.

1 Like

These are genuinely the most Incompetent set of Br changes i have ever seen.

Churchill up to 5.0? really?

M44s DOWN to 3.7?

Tiger II’s back to 6.3 where they will stomp on 5.3s again?

You are literally undoing all of the progress of decompressing the mid tier BR bracket over the past couple years.

AND THE HUMMEL? genuinely the best Artillery vehicle in the game now? More mobile than the Nashorn, with APHEDS and all that? You want to move that DOWN?

4 Likes

Or limit it to laser kh38 only

-No armor, best armor
-Amazing maneuverability
-Able to reliably kill everything it comes across (not even having to aim in a lot of cases)
-Has a .50 cal just to top it off

→ Gets a lower BR

3 Likes

You genuinely tell me with a Straight face that the Churchill MKVII is Equal to the KV1C.

Its way less mobile, the gun is worse, the armor is better yes, But it has MASSIVE weakspots.

At this rate we are going to see the Tiger’s and Panthers back to 5.3 and crap.

2 Likes

Gaijin thinks that the Churchill VII deserves to fight IS-2s

Genuinely just take the APHE back away from it. it didn’t need it. it worked fine without it.

id rather THAT, then it just get thrown to slaughter fighting 6.0s.

I don’t even LIKE the APHE. its way less reliable at actually penetrating things.

It fuses and detonates inside KV1 mantlets and does no damage. the Solid shot wouldn’t. it would punch through and kill crew.

1 Like

Churchill MKVII and Crocodile:

REMOVE THE APHE.

They didn’t need the rounds, and they 100% should not be fighting 6.0s JUST because you gave it a new over performing round.

Keep it at 4.7, and just take the APHE away. I have spoke to many that don’t like the APHE. The people that actually played the Churchill before. The APHE is less reliable at actually penetrating targets.

Geniere (Rank II → Rank III), currently this is the best Italian destroyer (because of American meta cannons with insane RoF, second is Impetuouso for the same reason) sitting at the highest 4.7 BR, all the other rank III Italian destroyers have 4.0-4.3 BR, all the other Italian 4.7 ships are placed at rank III. So it doesn’t make sence that this ship is placed at rank II. Increase of the rank will also provide Italian players with at least a premium competitive destroyer (because other Italian destroyers except Impetuouso are outclassed due to awful RoF and fragility) to complete special tasks having “rank III, destroyer” requirement.

2 Likes

British players are not Ameri-babies or germ-babies, We can fight, and win without APHE.

Unfortunately in infinite gaijin’s wisdom same later LASER guided weaponry doesn’t have limit from what distance you can lase for it. It has only limit on seeker from what distance it can pick up lased target. You could shoot them off by GNSS and guide them at target while being dozens KMs away from any SPAA…

Gnss weaponry I guess. Considering non gnss kh29l, kh25ml and agm65e2 are all capped to 10km despite having more range than that.

I dont know how to feel about it without kh38mls tho. Its not even sidegrade then, its just worse than su39 which is going to 11.7. I dont think thermals are worth losing 2 kh25mpu, 2 kh31p (kh58u isnt even close), 16 vikhrs, 2 r60m (useful to bait out some flares) and kopyo pod.
2 kh29t/2 kh58u, 4 kh25ml and 2 r73 on subsonic airframe seems meh for 11.7. F111f at 11.7 has much more speed and 8 ir fnf munitions which are almost guaranteed 8/8 kills in downtiers.