Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Hey, as mentioned in the text:

They are being removed now as other vehicles have already been added to expand the Japanese tree.

1 Like

I thonk Morvran should get banned from suggesting BR changes as it will only make the game worse

10 Likes

BMPT has shown it’s a fairly mediocre vehicle at 11.7.

5 Likes

Naval RB - Bretagne : 6.7 > 6.3

It is not much different from the Lorraine, the main difference is that the ship have one more turret, but it does not warrant a BR increase. It is one of the worst 6.7 battleship and would benefit to drop to 6.3 to be more competitive.

8 Likes

Vehicle: Leopard A1A1 (L/44)
Mode: RB
Change: 9.3 → 9.0
Reason: sure, it has the 120mm gun over the 1A5 which are going down to 9.0, but the 120mm gun isnt that of a Improvement that it would justify a 0.3 diffrent as DM33 is depending on the Angle/Range better than the 120mm DM13

7 Likes

FV4005
6.3 → 6.0 (No difference from proposed)

Correct its top speed

14 Likes

How is the ki-87 going to 5.3 but the zeros are 6.0!?

3 Likes

No change in Ground RB for YAK-9T/K, no change for Pucara in ground RB?

1 Like

What vehicles???

Let’s start addressing the elephant in the room (questionable planned BR changes in the spreadsheets).

A6M5 Ko

  • Air Realistic Battles: 6.05.7

Reasoning: I fail to see the justification for moving the A6M5 Ko to 6.0. To me, this seems to be an unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Ko, at its undeserved 5.7 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability as its main strength, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.

54 Likes

why gaijin complete ignoring 11.7 - 10.0 tanks?

1 Like

how does YAH compare to any of these helis going to 11.3, same br but no flare/chaff, ATAS, shit MAW and worse helfires??? how is that equal to the rest?

5 Likes

Vehicle; FlakRakRad
Mode; Ground Realistic
BR Changes; 11.7→11.3
Reason; the radars lacking Search and Track functions paired with only having 2 missiles ready to fire.
it should not be higher than the Tor-M1 which only has “worse” missiles compared to it.

6 Likes

Vehicle: Tornado SLE (GER)
Mode: Ground RB : 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: Subpar Flight Model, No HMD (Unlike the GR.4), Overall Less Weaponry compared to the GR.4, The HARMs themselves occupy most of the Hardpoints for more Lethal munition therefore you have less options for CAS and comparatively to other CAS Aircraft in the same BR Range its overall Worse in every Aspect.

8 Likes

Gaijin likes monies

1 Like

very strange proposal. m1a1 have similar capabilities to ipm1 with just slightly more armor, have same weakspots that can be penned by any 10.7 tank

3 Likes

Vehicle: T-80B
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 10.7 → 11.0
Currently one of the best if not the best tank at 10.7 with very good mobility, good armor, good optics and a very good reload. Also considering that the chinese UD/BE sits at 11.0 while trading off a lot of mobility for some armor this would be a logical change

2 Likes

Vehicle: C13 T90
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 7.3 —> 7.0 (6.7 would be better)
Reason:Lack of armor, insufficient ammunition, and inconvenience main gun firepower.It doesn’t deserve to be 7.3.

18 Likes

Tornado sle to 14.3

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.