Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

True, im just of the opinion no spaa should have aphe unless they actually go back on the aphe change decision. Would stop all the complaining about op spaa as it is purly aphe’s fault for it all.

Give them all the siddam treatment and give them 40 rounds of apds and pure belts of he.

Although, the only problem with that is vehicles with ahead would still have a pretty potent round against tanks but most of those are higher in br.

USA RB Ground BR’s:
- M4A3 (105): 3.0 up to 3.3. This thing is a low tier menace. Along with the StuH 42 G and SU-122. This isn’t just about balance, this change is also about new player retention. As a low tier enjoyer I can tell you squads love this tank.

This is a classic example of submarining. New players aren’t use to playing with a howitzer and slow turret traverse, so the overall winrate is low.

4 Likes

M109G going to 5.7 but M109A1 going to 6.0 really baffles me though. They should all be 6.0 or 5.7 except for Israeli M109 which should have lower BR than A1/G.

Yeah.

TLDR: If Gaijin stopped listening to CCs and actually realistically modeled the game, it would be better than it is now

I mean, the fakours ARE that good, its just a shame everything else about the jet is mediocre for 13.7. Only thing i can think of is either limiting the amount of fakours or something but people may not want that.

1 Like

This was literally the excuse they gave me for this

3 Likes

Can we just move the later Zeros down by 0.7-1.3 BR.

The A6M5 Ko was Mid at 5.3, bad at 5.7, and at 6.0 it isn’t even worth looking at.

Who tf saw the A6M5 Ko and thought “Yeah, this is on par with the F2G-1!”

5 Likes

Kinda sad its the ONLY 20mm spaa im actually good with… Somehow ill miss a plane not 1km away from me with the yestervark and yet im hitting 4km snipes with the skink like its nothing.

I still think 4.7 was a perfect spot for it, especially with the GOD DAMN BTR sat at 4.0 being as effective as some 7.3 spaa.

1 Like

F-14 IRIAF to 13.7?
A6M5 Ko to 6.0?
Hunter F.6 to 10.0?
Someone please explain

4 Likes

Rafale C F3 : move MICA EM modification up to Rank 3 or split MICA EM modification into 2

for real, why do we have to grind all the way to Rank 4 for a complete MICA EM set while stuck with 2 Magic II and 2 MICA EM for ages (and why the naval M F3-R gets it at Rank 3 easily)? it’s not that Meteor or MICA NG (and not the right block in game) will come very soon for them. At least 1) future proof and 2) lessen the grind

Im terrible with them all, but I also dont play those BRs often, so not gunna comment too much, but for me the tracking rate of the turret just felt terrible and I could barely keep my guns actually on target

Thats easy.

Britain Tax

5 Likes

I doubt either of hte current Rafales will get either Meteor or MICA NG.

Im guessing the F4 will be added specifically for the Meteor.

Tier 4 for the full Fox-3 fit is standard for most/all aircraft

1 Like

They’re making too much SL, so the reward is a BR increase. They pulled the same nonsense with the F-104s.

Meanwhile, the Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2 continue to be ignored. Fun.

2 Likes

The SOLE reason i havent bothered spading the mirage 2k yet is due to the mica mod being rank god damn 4… Like what do they expect me to do for the 40 or so games it would take me to get there?

Who am i kidding, they expect me to ge it just like they expect me to ge the chaff modification considering it is REQUIRED for top tier gameplay.

1 Like

Skink has fast turret tho.

Always felt really slow to me.

Prob stock and low crew.

had the mods unlocked and at least most of the crew skills, but not expert or ace

he did not said that. if he did. quote it.

11.7 is not low.
it was op because it was not finished and gaijin rushed the addition.

with all recent nerf. its avg at most.

yeah right…