Planes missing anti-radiation missiles

It is why I want 5 at a minimum for the GR1. A pantsir can deal with 4 without issue, 5 is a threat

5 is a minor annoyance, really. They’re all originating from the same launch angle, more or less, and you can engage the lot of them with pantsir pretty comfortably.

Yes and no. It can engage 4 at once, if launched close enough, with as little warning as possible… then maybe just maybe number 5 will hit.

We’ll see, I’m not convinced the closure rate is adequate to provide sufficient pressure.

ALARM would be much faster than AGM-65, around Mach 2 for a chunk of its travel time if we figure quite a close launch, like sub 10km and Ive seen 5-6 fired with 1-2 AGM-65s get through before.

A braver soul than I getting within 10km of a pantsir with a Tornado lol

Gotten that close before with the GR4, but then had the Pantsir intercept all 3 brimstones I had fired at it

1 Like

I hope the sufa gets it

2 Likes

Nice work dude, they accepted your report🔥🔥

1 Like

Although I made mine first😭✌️

I made several more interesting reports that no one including gaijing sees😒
Check them if you want:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/u/134876445/issues

1 Like

The list has been updated with the new bug reports

1 Like
5 Likes

Except that’s not whats happening. The Tornado GR.1 doesn’t have a lineup, I would welcome it being increased to 11.7 in GRB with ALARMs so it can have a lineup to work with, no I do not want to run just my Rooikat to get into it quickly.

Pantsir and 2S6 are capable of intercepting just about every bomb the GR.1 can throw at them and deny me while NATO doesn’t get any such equivalent. This is again just selective balancing and quite frankly Smin’s point is… pointless.

1 Like

But italian AV-8B Harrier II+ never bought AGM-122, so not receive Anti-radiation Missile

Export operators legacy Hornet (F/A-18A & F/A-18C) shouldn’t AGM-88

I haven’t found a source yet but I found some pictures. For the Su-24 and it’s KH-59MK.


copyImage

1 Like

AGM-45A AND AGM-78 too!!

17808391682888641012443277464946

1 Like

I just realised I saw that first picture too, but it’s the KH-59MK2 instead of MK no? (since website talks about MK2 only) https://web.archive.org/web/20181130123757/http://ktrv.ru/production/voennaya_produktsiya/
I think it’s probably enough proof nontheless.

Community Bug Reporting System Su-22M4 missing Kh-31A second take