Planes missing anti-radiation missiles

Japan is missing the ASM-3 which has a passive seeker mode that locks onto radar emissions

4 Likes

Why don’t we get any rank IX aircarft or AR missiles :(

1 Like

Tornado MFG:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/X2SRQUpdt8oJ

I think it’s mainly for not breaking the game,
I mean buccanneer S2 at 9.3 with 100+km range ARM missiles, that’s hard

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/52SPdHolF48P
Yak-41 missing KH-25MP

1 Like

Already closed.

I suspect Gripen E is going to use AGM-88 in the future, Probably within 1-2 years

Wrong buc.

Its the Buc S2B at 10.3

1 Like

I don’t know why. In another report, I provided different sources, and it was rejected by a different moderator (the sources were in English, but he felt something was missing).

Here, I provided the same ones plus one other, and suddenly it was closed.

I guess it just depends on which moderator you get.

In any case, I can post them here if anyone wants to see them.

1 Like

I can see the argument for not giving the MFG ARM being a 10.0 in GRB.

But the ASSTA1 and GR1 should definetly get them and move up to 11.7.

IDS (1995) would be a shame from an ARB/ASB PoV given the slightly lower BR compared to the RET8, but from a GRB perspective it wouldnt be the end of the world with the RET8 which is better

Tbf, I doubt they wound even need the BR increase, like, maybe gave them for now just the AGM-88A/B, see how it goes and decide, like even 11.0 planes are getting ARMs

True. But the gatekeeping they are doing and the gymnastics to justify it are just crazy

2 Likes

The Su-22m3 have ARM, and they are 10.0 in GRB

Yeah, but thats soviet for you

At this point, give the armament to everything that could carry it. Balance it afterwards. This artificial limitations for the sake of balance is tedious.

1 Like

Yeah. Id largely have no issue with that.

But Gaijin denying the GR1 ARM, so it stays at 11.3…

Where we have nothing to use it with…

Is the most stupid thing theyve done in a while

2 Likes

I agree that it is snart to restrict some of the more advanced ARMs with IOG, but then they should at least add the earlier NATO ones without IOG to match the soviet ones at 11.0

(Looks at HOSBO case)

1 Like

Su-17m4 at 11.0 with kh58. Su 39 11.3, Mig 27m 11.0

Could probably find more.

M2kd-r1 at 11.3, Italy su 22-m3 at 10.0, etc

1 Like

Israel:
F16I with ROCKS arm
F15s with possible ROCKS arm

Honorable mentions:
Delilah missile
Popeye missile

Report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZuijSlIr6InG

2 Likes