then show us this please?
its from the AVIC the dudes who make the missile lmao
5 Likes
I agree at least that normally this wouldn’t fly, but this is one of the only sources at all on the PL-12A. Sources like these, likewise photos from some exhibition show, were accepted because of this. This was posted also by, idk, the manufacturers of the missile itself, so it’s not completely non credible. But in this case there’s otherwise literally nothing else. The addition of the PL-12A was already quite dubious, considering there’s so little known.
You can find more in this thread, but the linked post specifically has some more sources regarding the PL-12 family of missiles:
1 Like
I guess one can still argue that SD-10A isn’t the PL-12, which has caused some issues before I remember on the bug report site. I guess further reinforced (that Gaijin believes so) by the fact only SD-10A got its statcard max speed changed to Mach 5 and not the regular PL-12 or 12A.
Is there anything specifically mentioning PL-12? I myself am convinced anyway though, especially given that PL-12A(E) is also quoted to be 38G. But just to be sure.
1 Like
yeah see this is what I mean this gives the argument credibility rather than what the other guy was saying about how its unreasonable that the developers of the game are asking him for accurate information instead of just changing the number to whatever people feel like.
so about that (also not there is nothing concrete mentioning the PL-12 iirc maybe some interviews but i dont have them on hand)
6 Likes
the developers currently is just changing the number to whatever they like
funny fact:
R77-1 has less drag than aim120
8 Likes
not true, like at all
1 Like
See how quick they NAB a issue relate to CN equipment? They just dont care, now any PL12 report directly gain a NAB
where’s the efficiency they fix the real BUG?
5 Likes
bro that bug report was shit tbh
5 Likes
That bug report is just a tool that rationalize GAIJIN want to buff Russian
This game never care player’s feedback
3 Likes
if you want something to change you need actual sources sadly, you just gotta pray that that change was an accident or that they heard your complaints
2 Likes
The did actually NAB the original source from AVIC
However they are using a plasitc model to prove SU30MKM can equip KH38
1 Like
they never hear any complain
never see this since the WW2 finished
2 Likes
they didnt? maximum G pull sadly means nothing to gajin as that can be achieved to maneuver but doesnt have to, they mainly make most missiles to have performance they themselves expect of them unless proven otherwise
1 Like
By their “expects” Dassault paid them to buff MICA, R77-1 gain an incredible total thrust under that missile length
JP is one of the major shareholder so they adding too many stuff in JP tech tree
So your contry should pay protection fee first then we talk about game play
7 Likes
What in gods name are you schizo posting about? Japan is one of the smaller tech trees and mind you didn’t even receive a vt4, because a certain community is too much of a baby to let other people have their vehicles. Dassault didnt pay them to buff the mica lmao it just has a unique seeker model. The MICA also isnt even made by Dassault. Like you have no valid points here you’re just schizo posting. China has received more than its fair share of good things and questionable balancing decisions lol.
1 Like
Just curious, why do you think China has received “more than its fair share of good things”? Which recently added indigenous Chinese equipment in the tech tree actually steamrolls other nations?
3 Likes
I strongly agree. I hope the official team can fix this issue instead of closing all related issues. Currently, PL12 and PL12A become very weak at close range, losing the fun they used to have.
5 Likes