I’d rather go all the way to the airfield than going for the carrier, create a proper suggestion post.
Man, landing on a carrier is more like achivement or skill test, airfields are easier but that is not the point.
Create a proper suggestion post, labeling a suggestion as simply discussion won’t change nothing and eventually will be locked.
I doing it just to know if others want this too.
I don’t know why you couldn’t have independent hook controls considering we had this in Birds of Steel (War Thunder before War Thunder). In fact off memory we even had magneto controls etc.
You have magneto controls in wt
1 Like
You can more than make it fit without issue.
This is also a sim thread. Can just add it to full realistic controls like trim and MEC is if it would bother you.
As for “It deploys automatically” - that requires the game server to properly recognize I’m going for a carrier landing and the carrier not to be glitching during my approach. I much rather have full control over my plane than rely on that. I’ve seen far too many carriers vibrate and jump around moments before touchdown.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It is not.
ARB does not have carrier take off and landing nearly as prevalent as air sim EC so those who don’t fly sim EC don’t feel the need for proper controls to make your plane behave in a reliable manner.
In sim, many of the popular maps have carriers: Sicily, Moresby, Tunisia, Denmark just off top of my head, Dover Strait i’m not sure on, but I think it does too.
Having tail hook controls is no different than having MEC or trim.
1 Like
You can discuss it further by yourself, as you gonna flag my response anyway
You just think it would be uselas mechanic, but I hope you relaised it wouldnt.
1 Like
Now I need someone to make the suggestion, because my suggestions for somereason dont appier in thr suggestion list.
I dont have that issue
Bruh really? in this thread? am I in wt forum?