https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Y5DSVtuUPzbG
2 Likes
60% of DM33 = 288mm why using Mango data?
where <=60%, so 280 is correct too.
Duplet tested agaist 3MB42
90% of BM26 is 324mm. Using only one projectile as your datapoint is not conclusive.
2 Likes
Ok. 90% of BM22 is 382mm. Using persentage data from this list is just stupid, cuz irl it isn’t a flat number like in game
you are wrong. BM26 old shell.
The key point here is comparative data.
If relikt is 50% and duplet is 90%, then it would be reasonable to conclude a 5:9 protection ratio, no?
That would be 250:450.
Either that or relikt doesn’t approach 250.
Using outdated shells that do not penetrate sloped armor well is simply incorrect.
Of course, sloped armor with ERA will have better resistance than just BM22, which does not penetrate sloped armor well.
your source is simply incorrect for a relict
My source is literally on-video live fire tests for duplet here. I feel it’s reasonable to say it’s probably reliable.
i about this.
Provide evidence of relikt exceeding 50% then. Otherwise your point is baseless
Why tho? U are using “persentage” data while translate it to the flat numbers. And when I’m doing the same thing you just saying that it isn’t correct) In the game there are no deference between BM22 and BM42 in terms of armor equivalent btw
This has already been proven when it was added to the game. There is no need to prove the same thing over and over again.
It is, 3bm22 penetrates sloped armor much worse.
Brilliant, so we know the number in mm is correct. and we don’t have another source on % protection. 250:450.
We cannot use a comparison of two ERAs from an incorrect source.
Your table simply cannot be used to compare Relict and Duplet.