Prove it’s incorrect. I have provided my evidence including live fire tests demonstrating its capability against FSDS shells at 100m and tandem charges. You are just making claims.
Yeah, and? In terms of penetraiting Duplet it uses 280mm reduction in penetration and not 382mm which is incorrect according to manufacturer source
I don’t have to. You send an unnamed table. That doesn’t count as a source.
In game Duplet corresponde to this test demonstrating
The table is from the live fire video…
The unnamed table added to the video has no weight.
The manufacturer itself claims 60% of 3BM42, which is fully achieved in the game.
Take the HEAT performance for example. Current side protection is 600mm from a single large duplet block. In the video, it stops PG-7VR with residual penetration of 30-45mm at 90 degrees. I’ll be generous and say 45mm.
PG-7VR has a penetration of 900mm without ERA. This means a reduction in HEAT charge performance vs tandem of 900-45, or 855mm.
This is not achieved, or even approached.
Additionally, your manufacturer source also demonstrably does not match live fire performance, making it incorrect. It claims <=70% vs PG-7VR. Residual penetration of 45mm with 900mm penetration is precisely 95%. 25% difference is not a small margin.
Again, you are making baseless claims.
2 Likes
The manufacturer itself claims 90% of 3BM22, which isn’t achived
is achieved. In X-Ray you see only estimate for modern APFSDS
No it’s not. It’s depleting only by 66%
Please check it out
Great, let me run through the same numbers again (this changes almost nothing)
I’ll use 45mm again.
PG-7VR in this case has a penetration of 750mm, despite this value being it’s post-ERA performance but whatever, i’ll run with it. This is a reduction in performance of 750-45, or 705mm.
This is not achieved.
Additionally, (705/750)*100 is a 94% reduction in performance. Far beyond the “<=70%” your source claims.
2 Likes
600mm pen official data, i check it
https://roe.ru/production/land-forces/small-arms-sv/grenade-launchers-sv/pg-7vr/?theme=
fully corresponde
1 Like
After ERA, i’m sure you are aware of that though :)
750.
vikhr has 800mm after era and 800mm in game
No relevance to the point whatsoever. Measuring using post-ERA protection values will get you incorrect results.
You also haven’t responded to the fact that your source disagrees with the demonstrated irl performance against tandem PG-7VR.
it is. In game its equals. 600mm - official value.
I don’t quite understand, everything is correct.
I can use (555/600)*100 (92.5%) if you want to be pedantic. Still far beyond the 70% your source claims. You are using a source with demonstrably incorrect info and just saying “everything is correct” does not, in fact, make it correct.
after ERA
750 before.
1 Like
its manufacturer source. You can send your question to manufacturer.