possibly. i suggest looking into IDR
Have you ever even played it? I can survive many hits in it by mutiple enemies as long as it’s not a HE slinger but by the time they see you they would already be desintegrated
1 Like
Yes and its tankier then a M60 for Mẹ because the turret basket always eat rounds.
1 Like
Not a good argument against. Lots of things in this game are experimental and/or not ready/functional at all, like:
Yak 141 (No Guns/Radars/Missiles ever equipped and tested)
MiG-9 (Guns did not function on original fighter models at High Alts)
T-34-100 (Gun cracked the turret after firing a couple times)
F-16AJ (Non-existant)
R2Y2s (Planned at most; never built or tested. Paper design fully)
Maus/E-100 (Non-complete; a turret and a hull for testing)
MBT-70/KPZ-70/XM-803 (Experimental Disaster)
M551 Sheridan (Gun-Launcher issues; prone to Spontaneous Combustion).
Not saying you can’t use it as an argument, just that. It’s a poor argument with all else we have in game.
1 Like
disaster❌
expensive af✅
1 Like
It can be both. Being expensive AF still makes it a disaster. Plus, it retained the Gun-Launcher tube which was always problematic.
1 Like
the army wants jack of all trade instead they get master of nothing
I wrote this like a day or 2 after it released on the live server, so the armor was a bit worse than it currently is. It wasn’t that good in the first few days of release but it’s become of of the best SPAAs for the tier. The only bad thing about it is the incorrect radar but it’s pretty good overall.
1 Like
My meaning was more along the lines that the ammo was either not made by that time (only advertised) or didnt work.
Cuz either way if 246 gets it, gepard can also get it.
But the ammo was mpstly just a proposal.
If you wouldn’t mind it instantly going to 9.0 minimum? Sure.
The Falcon went to 8.3 because of it’s belt, if you really think the XM246 with 640 rounds of full APDS belt would stay 8.3 you are delusional.
3 Likes
It’s a sidegrade. Better armor for far worse mobility.
1 Like
I mean sure…
If the mobility (less than mediocre) of the gepard was a strength to begin with.
German main moment. Seriously the Gepard has very decent mobility, the Leopard 1 chassis is far better than the M48 chassis.
4 Likes
Are we debating what statistically is better or what we think is better?
The BVM and M1A2 are about on par, the BVM lacks the backwards mobility, and traverse cababilities the M1A2 does, as well as the same levels of depression.
The M1A2 also has better optics no? Personally I find it ridiculous the M1A2 sits at 11.7 right now while stuff like the Leopard 2a5 sits at 12.0
with a worse reload, round, mobility, and arguably armour. However the top tier arguments for the big three really are silly.
Agreed there.
Yeah that as well, right now its far too compressed in GRB you’ve got stuff like the 2a4 and CR1 going up against M1A2’s and T80Us etc.
Reduced gun handling / turret travers ?
Hard agree that having the premium be better than the TT is ridiculous.
Clovis comes to mind right now. Or even the F18A/C being better than the 12.7 F16 for USA.
Yeah was thinking that when I was writing it man, still a small advantage technically
2 Likes
Gepard is one of the best 8.3 SPAA out there as it sits for both AA and TD, the only one I think is better is the Leopard 2 Swedish SPAA but its 8.7
2 Likes
The BVM wins it in terms of optics. BVM has gen 3 gunner thermals and no commander thermals, M1A2 has gen 1 thermals for both the gunner and commander.
looking at it performance wise. Abrams has better reverse speed, reload and gun depression while the BVM has a slightly more RB friendly armor profile and better optics.
While imo the 2A5 beats the M1A2 in armor profile, they should honestly be the same BR. However I don’t think either of them should be the same BR as the BVM.
I think Gaijin could make an entire BR range from the vehicles at 11.7-12.0 currently, let alone with the vehicles at 10.7-11.3. It’s absolutely insane how compressed top tier is.
1 Like
Optics isn’t just the thermals man, genuinely askign its magnifications as well.
Exactly my point, the M1A2 is also lower Br’d for some reason, at 11.7 theres also more abrams that have similar performance, while russia has the BVM, the T72B3 and T80U while I can use I find insanely frustrating to perform the same as in the M1A2.
Eh the BVM from what ive seen, and nearly at it, is worth of the same BRs as the M1A2 and 2A5.
It has more frontal armour on the UFP, but at these BRs you should never be firing at the UFP any ways.
LFP, Breach shot, and ofc side shots one tap it. same as any other tank.
Definitely agree on that, the fact were discussing these tanks which while similar are miles apart, AKA the T80U vs T80BVM, or M1A1 VS the M1A2. 2a5 VS 2a7 (these are the same Br while the 2a5 is objectively worse in every way bar mobility)
Is wild, they could make a BR up to 12.7 as you say at the least.
Gotta love facing off against Type 90s in shit like the Cr1 Mk2 or the T72B xd while decent for their BRs respectively an uptiers a death sentance for them.
1 Like
3x-10x zoom for the M1A2 vs 4x-12x zoom for the BVM. SEPs are a bit of an improvement with 3x-13x zoom.
The BVM was incredibly dominant against these vehicles back in the day, which should be enough to not have them at the same BR, especially not until they also model the new detailed modules for the BVM as well.
Same. Gotta love enjoying my 105 armed tanks and suddenly facing an M1A1 and T-80UM-2.
Always get mixed up in the zooms.
The issue ive got with top tier for the big 3, they really are incredibly similar in most aspects , sure one may eek out a bit more armour, or firepower etc but its all marginals.
I mean I was facing them in the CR2 and id rather face the BVM than the leo2a6 /M1A2 at the time.
(didnt really like fighting many of any of them TBH was always an uphill battle)
It’s mortifying af isn’t it.
It’s why i stick to around 9.3 and 10.0
1 Like
“muh duh german main so you stoopid.”
yeah ad hominem really helps ur case.
you forgot my point that the Gepard nor leopard 1 have such amazing mobility that you could outrun CAS.
unless youre talking about AT ability in which case WHY are you using an SPAA against tanks?
1 Like