Op missiles

i never said u were forced to play F1CT, bruh.
and i already know people buy the F1C-200 cuz they have nothing but reserve planes in Fr*nce.

cof cof AIM-7F with good radar locking on da big baguette plane cof cof

the only way u can die against a Phoenix is if the enemy launches it at like 10km or less or if u don’t know a sh*t about notching.

F-4J/S gets way better radar than the F-4E, combined with the 3rd best Sparrow (which is sadly still a Sparrow) it’s an actually deadly aircraft.

  1. no, if u don’t have a good RWR, not even if u are a “good player”, u will not be able survive against SARH/ARH missiles. go play MiG-21SMT in an uptier and u will see what i mean when i say u NEED a good RWR.
  2. no, i don’t throw the R-27ER around like it’s a boogeyman, i see u have basically never faced a R-27ER in ur entire life cuz that missile is basically the best SARH missile with the best maneuverability/top speed/range/multi-functioning ingame. at least when i played it (when it was still meta), getting a kill with the ER was ez asf.
  3. AIM-9M sucks, AAM-3 is the same BS but slightly better, R-60M can be one-flared at 1m cuz it literally has no flare resistance and if u dare to say it can actually ignore flares i will fr flag any of ur next replies.

why do all WT players say the same BS?

i don’t even need to play F1C/CT to know that the CT is way better at anything while sitting at the same BR (which is unfair). just by looking at the ingame data (RWR, ballistic computer, stats, modernity, etc) i can clearly know which F1 is better.

F1C/F1C-200 sucks most of the time and basically the only reason of why it sits at 12.0 is cuz it has Magic 2s. F1CT has Magic 2s in stock while F1C doesn’t and F1C-200 wouldn’t if it wasn’t a premium.

the F1CT should be a premium, not a copy-paste version of a tech tree plane with “200” attached to it’s name.

i’m currently grinding France with NF-5A (i wanted F1C-200 but it wasn’t on sale) and im near of getting my first F1.

the same AIM 7F that you can roll? yeah right.

Yeah, basically what I said, it only filters tabbed out people and wallet warriors who bought in with zero experience.

Screenshot_3
huh uh.
bruh
huuuuh uh

Apples to oranges dude, we’re not talking about the mig21smt here.

I fly the kfir C10 often so I do face it but I usually just notch it because R27ER carriers also tend to have a dogshit radar. Yes it’s the best SARH in the game, no it’s not undefeatable, you can even thrash it kinematically with a wide turn and a slight climb if you’re far enough.

Aim9M/AAM3 literally have the same seeker, the only difference is one pulls somewhat better, the r60m can go through flares if you’re on full burner and spamming flares like a monkey, hell I’ve had aim9G’s go through flares rear aspect on players that were full afterburning and going straight. And please, keep telling me you’re going to abuse flagging, I’m sure someone on the staff will have a lovely chat with you about ToS and what they entail.

Because experience gives us the insight we need to avoid running our mouths about vehicles we’ve never tried before? If I were to barge in the mig29 thread and run my mouth about a hyper specific thing even though I’ve never flown it I would get widespread ridicule and mockery from the regulars of that thread, not to mention mass flaging for derailing wink wink

In game data =/= Match performance.

Maybe instead of looking at in game data that isn’t relevant you might want to take a look at actual relevant data from players that completely disproves your point, but what do I know.

well maybe you should wait till you get the F1 before going on a massive rant about the rwr of two jets you’ve never flown against a guy who’s flown the plane you’re moaning about extensively, yeah?

anyway let’s stick to the topic, this clown argument isn’t productive.

Alright back on topic.

OP, watch this, it’s probably the most grounded and best put together video on notching you can find out there, and the guy who made it also uses a dogshit airframe proving that you can notch in anything.

Tell me how many times have u barrel rolled an AIM-7F, smart guy.

F-4S is played by lvl 1 wallet warriors, it obviously has bad stats. If ur brains combines world stats with ingame performance then i need to tell u that u’re wrong. Btw i was talking about plane performance, not PLAYER performance. And btw u showed the wrong planes (probably on purpose), i was talking about the american F-4J, the TT one.

But we’re talking about trash RWR, aren’t we? Learn to read.

Never happened to me, and btw R-27ER has IOG so Su-27s and their ugly radar can relock u with ease.

Lol pls tell me u drank something poisonous while writing THIS.

R-60M has ABSOLUTELY no flares resistance, and u’re an idiot if u believe that.
No matter how much spam do u do, if anything drops a flare, ur R-60M is basically cooked. A FLY could poop a 0.0000000001m sized flare from it’s ass and the R-60M would go for it.

Mmmm what about irl information found everywhere? Even in the most military and suspicious websites with actually real information of a certain vehicle? What about videos and YTbers? Isn’t that valid?

Oh dear god u need to be kidding.
Did u know they’re the same aircraft at the same BR, right? Match performance is the same with the F1CT being slightly better in the defense department.

So u just proved my point, thx for that.

The only plane u flown is a premium version of a TT vehicle u’re showing me u also don’t own, so saying F1C is better than F1CT just cuz u played a premium BS and NOT the actual F1CT tells a lot more than what i have said till now. U literally admitted u don’t want to play with that planes due to the stock grind, which says a lot about ur lazyness of actually proving that u’re right.

Staying high also means you get eaten alive by anything with ARH.

1 Like

Honestly didn’t have any trouble with either. DO have trouble with R-27ER/R-27ET though, but I guess that ain’t just me being hit by one without ever suspecting.

If u don’t have chaff, yes, if u have, skill issue.

Many times, if you care that much you can go watch replays of all my 211 games in the F1C.

Nice so we’re moving the goalpost yet again because your argument is paper thin, please keep going this is very amusing. And if you want people to understand your points better I suggest you stop vagueposting, it’s annoying. Player perfomance is a good indicator of a plane’s perfomance, graphs and data and whatever else you’re yapping about don’t matter in a vacuum, match performance does though.

urafuckingmoron2

surprise, surprise, it’s still got dogshit stats.

… on the mirage F1’s, a totally different aircraft, cute attempt though A+ for effort.

skill issue

Skill. Issue.

Giving you back some of that snark because you conveniently chose to ignore the part where I said that any missile will punch through flares if the guy you’re firing at is afterburning and going straight. Again, cute.

We’re talking about the F1 in the game, not in real life. What the fuck are you even talking about at this point.

…no? It literally shows you clear as day that your supposedly better F1 with its apparently amazing RWR actually does worse in game than the “worse” one with the basic RWR. Is there a fucking gas leak in your room?

…yeah there’s def a gas leak in your room, need to get that checked. Or maybe your spelling is that bad, idk.

Anyway please keep yapping, I love arguing with players like you that make assumptions about vehicles they don’t have.

The best part is you’re arguing about something that nobody gives a damn about, the two causes of deaths for experienced players in jets like the F1s are usually guns and IR missiles while dogfighting somebody, radar missiles at 12.0 are still easy to dodge, the only real radar missile threat at the BR, again, is the R24R because of its insane accel and excellent low alt perfomance. And that thing can still can be avoided RWR or not by simply looking around and positioning properly.

With some vehicles you will run out pretty quickly so I do get that. Especially with how much ARM spam there is due to the AESA and increased loadouts.

@Bazingabrain @Flanker_Thunder Going forward lets stay on topic, and avoid insulting each other.

2 Likes

bro, i play russian planes with their limited 96 CM and i almost never run out of them. if u spam them like a scared mouse u will obviously run out of them, u usually just need like 4 large chaff to dodge an ARH missile, more if it’s near u or in a blind spot and u noticed it late.

1 Like

I think one of the only aircraft that can legit complain about CM count is the 13.3 F-16s

which of them?

the F-16As, the US one at least has 30 CMs and 15 LCMs

1 Like

yeah they should give it more CM or remove the AMRAAMs of it so it can stand a chance against Fox-3s with so limited CMs.

Well… It just got AMRAAM, so I doubt they will remove it :D

1 Like

Captura de pantalla 2026-02-10 205730

1 Like

96 is plenty, especially 96 large, but what about say 72, or even 45. That is 100% not enough to stay up.

45 no, 72… Depends how you fly, Stay defensive, use range and kinematics to defeat missiles where you can, should be perfectly managable. and I assume you mean the J-10C which I think is also large not standard

If you are zerg rushing down the centre of the map and inviting everyone to fire at you, then of course you’ll run out fast

1 Like
  1. no, 96 is not plenty, talk about F-15I with 240 normal CM which means u just need to drop double the amount than u would with large CM.
  2. many toptier planes with low amounts of countermesures usually use large countermesures (J-10 for example), and planes with 45 CM usually have also 15 large CM (whatever i agree that they should go down in BR or smth due to the low amount).