Off Topic Discussion

no idea, china propably is the next tree i am going for but it is definitly missing their AH 64s as well but at least the us heli tree in china is already growing

They need the Cheetah to be honest. It’s depressing.

1 Like

Nope, the SAAF operated mirage F1s and the RAAF operated mirage IIIs

Ermm hello

I really want the Cheetah, but people are naysayers

image

1 Like

What’s that? A proposed model? A one-off trial?

The pro UK and the Sub-tree isn’t a tech tree groups are at war in the thread for it.

1 Like

SAAF Mirage IIIs they had 58 of them

Oh, sorry that I forgot about the 10.3 airframe when answering @x_Shini about any of the SAAFs and RAAFs mirages being 12.3 material

2 Likes

Even I’m in the camp of saying that a sub tree nation shouldn’t be exclusive. But playing U.K and seeing friends play it is depressing.

The U.K needs the Cheetah even if it wasn’t South African.

The Cheetah is south african tho

“The U.K needs the Cheetah EVEN IF IT WASN’T SOUTH AFRICAN.”

Ah, I thought you were having a go at the people being like: Akshually its a french plane with mods from israel, so it should go to the israeli tree

I’m in the opinion a nation that has a sub-tree would get the sub-trees stuff all of it. It’s a nation in game you should be able to play all their stuff in the Same Place

1 Like

Yea other wise what is the point in a sub tree.

image

1 Like

give me

Previously Romania was split between France and Italy, even Canada is split between the U.S and U.K.

Even now, the ITO is split between France and Sweden.

Romania and Canada aren’t sub trees not even nations in game yet.

1 Like