🤤 gorgeous
But why? I really curious why
My main point would be further and unnecessary segregation of players.
We don’t know have segregation based on vehicle mode, but also in arcade/realistic/simulator battles and battle ratings. Adding another layer too this would be too much.
Additionally, War Thunder isn’t a game where player skill matters as much as in other games.
Yes, there is tons of room for skill expression, but the difference between a bad and good War Thunder player is much less than in, for example, Fortnite or Counter Strike.
The problem with teams getting stomped usually stems from imbalances in maps and lineups, not player skill per say. Fixing these issues would get you much further than a skill based matchmaker that would likely be very inaccurate anyways.
War Thunder isn’t a competitive game, so let’s not try yo make it
1 Like
Giib
Btw I just heard abou the US new Israel law.
I wonder if this will effect the treatment towards Israel by US players.
What would that be.
Another money package?
1 Like
I can’t explain it into words but there this video
But yea it’s basically a " you must not say anything bad about Israel" law is what I gathered.
Ok, sorry to get political, BUT
I believe it is Gaza’s fault they couldn’t drive out Hamas in time, it’s bs people are saying free Gaza when they put themselves in the situation, and before people start picking fights I know my facts, especially because my career and what a lot of my family does/did.
I respect everyone’s opinion as long as they respect mine.
Yeah blame the victims. Also Political discussion is strongly against the rules.
4 Likes
Pretty dumb law.
1 Like
Wonder if u skimmed
Also what news sources have you been reading?
Not mainstream ofc.
Good good, but like you don’t have to tell me but just do a quick search and ask on Reddit Who is “(your news source)” backed by
I think you are new here. I’m not gonna get into that loophole of blaming again. I would just remind you to pay attention to the Forum rules.
So if I’m in the wrong what about (look at my later replies
Basically it’s legally defining antisemitism, they’re using the definition from the International Holocaust Rememberance Alliance (IHRA). Includes some stuff like saying “Israel shouldn’t exist/is racist” is anti-semetic. The issue comes from the law’s defintion not including the notes from their (the IHRA) definition which says protesting the actions and policy of the Israeli Goverment is not anti-semetic. I should add this law was introduced in 2019, it’s just taken forever to actually reach the floor. Largly wouldn’t be a problem and providing a line in the sand for what is and isn’t hatespeach if it had either come much eariler or included the notes. The whole situation is a clusterfuck eitherway.
2 Likes
you’re really Trying to get yourself silenced
no politics isn’t exactly a negotiable rule here
2 Likes
This
Thank you for clarifying