Guy’s King of Bad takes is at it again.
Considering that they are calling this event reward C&P they are one of those people who think variants are C&P. Oh boy more people oh think a “Sherman Firefly is C&P”
Guy’s King of Bad takes is at it again.
Considering that they are calling this event reward C&P they are one of those people who think variants are C&P. Oh boy more people oh think a “Sherman Firefly is C&P”
it seems im the only guy that likes the Jag
I wish I could get that guy to the forum especially RR&D so we can show him how wrong his takes are.
First, it was only Sub-trees despite the fact we can only get 3 more. Now it’s a plane that far from C&P just because it’s part of another family of vehicles.
watch em claim all Leopard 2s are Lazy C&Ps of the Leo 1 (base variant)
Considering they said Isreal was all C&P and should have been a sub-tree I could see that.
By this logic does the P-51 can only be in the British tree I mean they were made for us from the start.
So all of the American one should be removed and re-added to the British tree
ur logic is dumb
No that the C&P logic not mine.
Is the R1 the radar version?
yeah
Hmm well thats weird…maybe the chaff fooled the missile straight into your allie
If people want there stuff in native trees only then us Brits should only get the P-51 as it was made for us from the start
problem is its not suppoed to be Copy paste
Same thing happened to me while using AIM-7F.
its absolutely annoying
" P-51, a single-seat, single-engine fighter aircraft originally designed and produced by North American Aviation for the British Royal Air Force (RAF) and later adopted by the U.S. Army Air Forces (USAAF)."
We have the first claim there for the American ones are considered C&P lol
let me post
It’s way more annoying if you use AIM-7F/M, that missile barely flys straight.
Considering his “New nation” take was all other nations have nothing unique and all are C&P I should have expected this take.
He is turning out as bad as a user I met before who called the Firefly C&P but a modified Sherman in the US tree was not despite both being the same thing.
mhm I just love how it’s one rule for C&P is it’s convenient to their argument but another if it doesn’t.
Which is why I never care about C&P lol