I have no idea. he made like countless tech trees and then vanished.
going back and looking into some of his trees I’ve been finding a lot of fake vehicles.
I have no idea. he made like countless tech trees and then vanished.
going back and looking into some of his trees I’ve been finding a lot of fake vehicles.
Yeah his research isnt very thorough but its very good for finding obscure vehicles.
Potentially just a CANZUK tree with mostly domestic options (and things like the CF-18 and Kiwi F-16’s C&P to fill large gaps like the current one).
no, a Paper vehicle like that can’t be in the TT
I mean that is kinda what this covo was about. well, an independent CANZ tree with the rules we have.
With how Gaijin doesn’t seem to want to do trees with more than 2 official nations(a main tree and sub-tree) so no alliance trees. mostly because if they where we would have and a Commonwealth tree added before they ever started this sub-tree thing.
This comes up with the Benelux because both use the same solution.
Main tree+Sub tree and relation nation to have a home in that tree.
“Benelux”:Netherlands(Main tree)+Belgum(Sub tree)+Luxembourg
“Commonwealth/CANZ”: Canada(Main tree)+Australia(Sub tree)+New Zealand
Now remember these aren’t final or how they will be put in-game just based on what I could find or people I’ve talked to. and positions in the tree can change.
With the “Benelux”, most people told me the Dutch would best be the face of the tree.
and with “Commonwealth/CANZ” it is the same as what I said earlier:
If we’re doing a hard 2 nations per faction thing i think you should put Australia with a kiwi subtree and then put canada all by itself because it absolutely can stand on its own (id argue its more viable than israel and only a little less viable than pre-finland sweden).
ANZAC is one of the least viable trees that I can think of
Youd be surprised how much the aussies were up to especially early on
I’ve seen their stuff, its nothing to write home about
Look i think theyd all be better suited as commonwealth subtree of uk (except pakistan in china and an independent israel style india).
To be honest this used to be my wish for how things were done.
I’m a hard supporter for an independent Canada tree. And always wanted an ANZAC tree more.
I prefer the separate Canada and ANZAC trees over my “Commonwealth” tree idea. but as it stands the “Commonwealth/CANZ” one is looking like a better option.
With that said if they arent doing a commonwealth subtree then independent canada, anzac, and india feel more natural than smashing it all together in a commonwealth tree that has nothing to do with britain game mechanics wise.
For trees like ANZAC it would be great if gaijin would start creating secondary tech trees for existing nations instead of stuffing sub nations into the main trees
That way you could include way more stuff than in a sub-tree and gaps of such a sub-nation could be filled with vehicles from the main nation instead of having to rely of paper stuff, planned/tested stuff and pure copy paste
Wild that here is where the serius discussion is rn
The custom loadouts for the 190 f8 slap so hard. You can take the rockets and the 1000kg bomb. I’m regularly walking away with 3-4 kills on ground targets per run.
Hot take: kamikaze should be a thing in naval, since all sorts of sides did it.
I was in a custom once and someone slammed a jet into me well I was in Belfast and I exploded.
I think they let their secondary go right before.
Imagine getting kamikazied by the 6 engine flying boat.
Sunderland to the forehead
Having no aa and seeing a ki10 slowly approach.