Off Topic Discussion

Oh so saying “Sweden Shares (or shared) a Military policy with Swizerland” is ok but saying France and Swizeland shared also Military things is suddently wrong ?

I was giving a Possible explanation for why people would say Switzerland can go in the Swedish tree and not a Justification for it

honestly imo Swizerland can at best get it’s own tree

besides that They definitely didn’t share anything with anyone during that war

sweden is propably the worst idea out of everything i heard, specialy since all northern nations already are included there, they already have sweden, finnland, norway and propably denmak.

Switzerland realy has no place their. Switz vehicles propably gonna be put into either france or germany depending which nations needs the vehicle more / where it fits better

2 Likes

The Swiss government initially intercepted German aircraft in 1940 during the Battle of France, so in any case Germany would be the last country of both where a Swiss subTT would have to go to :p

But in the best case, if not a fully TT, Swiss vehicle could come in both France and Germany, depending of the vehicles.

i am just saying switz hunter is in germany, and most switz vehicles are german based as well

1 Like

You already have a Hunter that should have be for UK, if not for France since they have more ties, stop it.

…most Swiss vehicles are domestically designed and produced.

2 Likes

gonna repeat it, germany never asked for a copy paste hunter, we would have prefered a new model alpha jet, which would have benefited france as well, but as it stands currently switz vehicles are in germany

1 Like

yeah had that bit confused , had the panzer 87 and leo modifications in my mind

But afaik Gaijin confirmed Swiss is not a German subTT.

And yeah, you never ask… (lol). But you got a lot of things that you should not have.

Indeed, Gaijin confirmed the Swiss Hunter isn’t indicative of the future plans regarding Switzerland.

1 Like

So the best bet would be to distribute Swiss vehicles to whatever nations in need and have some links with.

the only vehicle that had nothing to with germany to my knowledge is the JaPz.K A2 , others were co designed by germany, that being said they propably should change the flag of that one

so france and germany like we said

Switzerland would be better off independently.

Switzerland can go either way. We can only state our opinion on where it best could go.
I personally think that a tech tree that nations like Germany or France can pull from is the least offensive solution.

I find sharing opinions enjoyable, makes me thankful that the forums are a thing.

Adding Swiss products to France and Germany wouldn’t be so offensive, but it would be quite a waste from what I think is a potent nation that could work very well on it’s own.
To me it’s like if Italy didn’t get added independently and would instead have it’s vehicles scattered around, it’d be a huge waste.

1 Like

yes exactly, they have enough Domestic designs and Modifications to have their own tree, definitely equal to Sweden and Israel

1 Like

maybe, but it just isnt sustainable, if we go with the switz standalone tree, it would be years in the future. It by far is none of the more intresting options. Additionaly at that point we might god knows how many trees, making new vehicles more and more work. It just is more sustainable to add switz vehicles shared into other trees

But again how many nation can we add to a nation before it looses it’s identity ?

1 Like