Aussies don’t have enough(I don’t think so but I’ve only ever seen one independent tree for them) but I’ve seen plenty of small Canadian trees with next to or no Copy-and-paste.
Well, I don’t care whether is the Aussie or the Canadian that are the face of the tree it looks like it would work like this from what I’ve seen and how the snail wants to do tech trees:
Canada (face of tree) Australia(subtree) New Zealand (there)
We got both Canada and Australia a home and the community gets a “Commonwealth tree” at the same time. (A popular option)
If what Sweden thought us Australia has alot properly more than the Swedish air did at launch.
Don’t get me stated on the Turbo Boomerang nor the Kangaroo hehe. Ground has some awesome stuff as well which some has already have make it to the game but yea it can be added.
Canada, Australia and New Zealand work well together.
Where one falls short the other picks up the slack.
Australia and Zealand built to defend their homeland, and Canada built for lend-lease(and had more than a small piece of that pie).
but it still comes down to who’s added first.
I say Canada due to being strong on the ground but they are ok in the air. (I can make something work with just domestic version/licensed built stuff. both seem to be the same thing to aircraft listing websites and places a licensed built craft as a domestic variant.)
Australia on the other hand is stronger in the air but be one of the weakest ground nation I’ve seen.
I just realized this sounds like it’s a Canadian tree relying on an Australian air tree. It’s not wrong it’s where the Aussie would be the most helpful.
The best way to do it, it’s to give the tree its sub-nation within the same year. late say “Canada” was added in the spring update “Australia” should come in the fall update.
Countries are interchangeable in my example.
Yea and they even had their own series of Mustangs too so around 3.0 to 5.0 isn’t lacking. Just a shame that even though they haven’t said it and pretend not to they will be just a filler country which is a shame
What makes WW2 work(not to sure post/cold war) out at least is that Canada and Australia almost never built the same plane so well Australia would bring one plane Canada would be a different one.
Indeed the Dominions are in the top 5 nations out of what is left to be added that deserve a tech tree the most.
that is something compared to Canada who had basically every jet after the CL-13 Saber(they were introduced during its life) uses Orenda Engines(a domestic engine company who was built the RCAF engines for a long time by now)
well for the licensed-built stuff. looks to have done some licenced-built engines that company did.
They only built one FDB-1 and abandoned the design due to lackluster performance. The Vickers Vancouver is a nice looking flying boat, but it’s a 1930s design, not sure if it even has the performance needed for BR 1.0
Anyways, I’m gonna stop trying to argue with you at this point. We both clearly are dead-set on our opinions here.
AH-64, F-16, F-35 (Until whenever Germany starts production, they’ll likely get there by the time we get to it in Warthunder), and the Leopard 2A6MA2 (For whatever modifications that brings)
