Its unbalanced because they faked the velocity of the projectile. Which is absolutely not possible to achieve at this current time with the latest technology. And the UFP armor values are 100mm LOS too thick. Its typical Gaijin shenanigans.
1 Like
My man,
You got all the good pieces of the game and still complaining about 292 BR?
You ain’t good with the presence of the whole Sweden and German buff in the latest updates? Strv 122A/B+/PLSS, Leopard 2A6/PSO/7V?
You really want to suggest moving 292 up BR? For what? 10.7? then you can smash that thing with diamond armor on Swedish MBTs or the monster speed of a Leopard 2A?
C’mon, learn to play, when I just saw Strv 122s on you battle record I couldn’t just do nothing than laugh on your face for complaining with a whole broken top tier lineup. If you have it, and I think not, I can be wrong since I didn’t saw at RB records, you would know the reason behind its current BR.
Now take a drink of copium, you can’t stand with out it.
1 Like
why is there always like 10 people who are so incompetently surprised when they introduce new vehicles…
9/10 times they are Under tiered for a week to 6 months. ALL games do this, so that people get hyped up to get/buy the vehicles and play them.
They will probably put it up to 10.3 or higher, in an update or so.
1 Like
the m1 Abrams cant kill the the T80 or theBVM in game from the front .the shell is just absorb bu its applied armor , then 1 shot the Abrams . Turn as fast as you want ,your turret can spin as fast as you like ,but if your shell can’t hurt the enemy then all that stuff means nothing ,becausr your dead .
The abrams can lolpen through the LFP and drivers port which will both oneshot the T-80 or shoot through the breach, unironically the abrams is harder to kill than the T-80 since oneshots are unreliable
1 Like
You dont even know what lolpen means lmao.
Wanna bet on that? İ can Show dozens of footage where either driver port or driver itself eats the shell, same thing happens to me when i use my T-80’s.
Simply untrue, you can easily one shot Abrams, sounds like skill issue.
3 Likes
Not sure about 1 shots but generally just easier to pen abrams, both the driver port and the front in general
Think it’s because how small the driver port on the T90 and T80 is, you just have a high chance of hitting overlapping/angled stuff that just renders the shell useless
1 Like
Good points.
İ also noticed bulkheads on fuel Tanks cause massive spalling when shell penetrates the Abrams, last night i got one shotted multiple times because of that.
Abrams needs a overall rework in armor section.
3 Likes
The skill issue is on your part im not the one whining about the T-80
1 Like
İ wasnt even whining about T-80.
İmprove your comprehending skills before reading and making replies next time.
he’s coping cuz you told the truth so the only answer he got its “you coping, nuh uh”
Yea its not the first time he done this.
“i wasnt even whining about T-80.”
^ This is quite literally whining except worded to make it seem like you’re playing both sides.
I also took the liberty of looking at your stats directly - especially after you said “when i use my T-80’s”, and your T-80B K/D is 1.69. Your M1 Abrams K/D is 2, and your M1 Abrams KVT K/D is 2.13. All vehicles at the same BR. So I find it quite dubious that you act like this.
Yet you compeletly ignored my M1A2,SEP,SEPV2 and T80BVM records.
My BVM service record surprass all of my M1A2 series but somehow you ignored that fact cause you like to do cherrypicking.
Good hypocracy i must say, but try someone else’s door.
Also this has nothing to do with my statements, feel free to prove my points wrong, if you can of course.
2 Likes
You now remember the LOSAT is 10.3.
cherry picking at its peak
Surprised?
İ was expecting kind of reacting from someone, best part is none of them tried to prove my points wrong but instead they went after my service record.
It quite literally does?
You’re talking about the T-80 eating shells and all that, especially in comparison to the Abrams - yet your K/D in the Abrams is better. As for top tier, your SEP K/D is 1.56 and your BVM K/D is 1.83.
Certainly quite the strong wording to use “surpass” for a discrepancy that’s lower than your T-80B and Abrams one.
You also sneakily forgot to mention the T-80UK, the 11.3 T-80 in which you have a 1.46 K/D.
We have another one here:
“cherry picking”. No? There’s only one 10.3 T-80. Compared to his Abrams stats in the two Abrams-es at the same BR, of which they are the only ones. It isn’t cherry picking. It’s LITERALLY the T-80 AND the Abrams at their matching BRs. What is wrong with you?
1 Like
that’s why you use service record instead of using the average per game and direct experience against this vehicles, since i could say the same for someone who just started the game. Using kd as a way of measuring isnt exactly a good measure, to be honest. That’s why i’d rather check on experience than use the more inaccurate K’D that could be taken out of 200 or 2000 battles, in which it may have disparities for X or X reason out of somebody’s control
1 Like
Like it or not my BVM record is better then M1A2 despite it lacks gun depression,mobility and firepower.
Sucks i guess? Try harder tho.
No one stated that discussion was about T80B but you because it suits your claim, as i Said before cherrypicking at its best.
T-80 is general name of that tank family, discussion can be about B model or U model or even BVM model, english is not my first language but even i can see the clear the difference.
Same goes Abrams as Well, its a general name for that family.
İf you have comprehending problems i suggest improve yourself and try not to be arrogant next time.
1 Like