2A4 has the same HP/t (27.2) as T-80U and it’s at 10.3, not 11.0.
Having great mobility at ~10.0 isn’t strange.
1 Like
This is why 2A4 is a whole BR bracket below T-80U, you know that, right ?
How do you know this ?
You’re performing literally the same in obscenely undertiered vehicles as in other, decently placed ones.
2 Likes
Neither does the Object 292 though.
Which comes with the downside of having the absolute worst reload at high tier.
I try not to comment on vehicles I don’t have any experience playing, but this 292 seems like a decent 10.3 - 10.7 vehicle, it’s massive penetration doesn’t make much of a difference given that 3BM-42 also doesn’t struggle to deal with it’s opposition.
The lack of thermals, the terrible turret traverse, gun depression and poor survivability aren’t anything new to Soviet MBTs, but at least the Object 292 has some decent armour to warrant a BR increase over the T-80B regardless.
2 Likes
You’re justifying this? On the armor test it shows the 3bm42 having the same protection as T72 and T80, only the 3bm60 or equivalent can reliably penetrate other areas
1 Like
Justifying what?
And propably mobility would be increased because someone reported it has 1250HP turbine from T-80U, so mobility would be on par to T-80U, insane. With better engine it’s 10.7 material minimum. 10.7 is playings downtiers most of the times but it would have a chance to face top tier with this shell
1 Like
this is a FOMO artificial scarcity at a br where there is already very strong premium lineup, which are spammed in the millions. 9.7 - 9.0 never has and never will have matchmaker that isnt 110% full uptier.
this vehicle needs to be a novelty at a br where it wont annihilate this game, like most event vehicles should be. binned power fantasy mbt facing m60’s. hilarious lol.
you can bring this comfortably to a 11.7 lineup, the only requirements being: read aloud and admit “russian vehicles do not need 10000mm frontal plates and turrets at every single br at all times, there are other nations in this game who do not have any armor and so my playstyle may have to be adjusted.” and preferably have at least a 27" 1440p monitor if the thermals are such a big problem. infantry sized maps are the normal in this game anyway.
2 Likes
still agree 10.3 for this thing after playing it
too good for 10.0, but it will be way over for 10.7
Object 292 should be at least 11.0 br
Strengths:
+++Even without ERA,it has good armour(around its BR,it can be penetrated only specific places all the while object 292 can shoot you anywhere to kill you)
++++Ridiciliously powerful cannon and ammo(it can pen leopard2a4 turret cheeks and M1A1HC DU turret cheeks and kill them with ease no matter where it shoots)(Point and click)
++Decent reverse speed(it can get out of some situations)
++Decent mobility
Weaknesses:
–No thermals
- No machine gun and smoke bombs
I put extra ‘+’ and ‘-’ to show its strengths and weaknesses goodness and weakness.For example, ‘++++’ means OP.My problem with object 292’s br is when you are in a leopard 2a4 or other vehicles ,you have to shoot specific place lower plate all the while it can shoot you anywhere to kill you even if it shoots you at turret cheeks.
6 Likes
11.0 might be excessive given the tanks that are there. But it definitely feels like a 10.7 meme machine.
If it becomes 10.7 it can be downtiered and it will be devastating for opposing team
Yall are whining for nothing. Its just like a tank destroyer in 5.0, massive gun with thin armor, just don’t get shot by it. Plus right now no one knows how to play them so its just easy kills.
It is a well armored cannon.What you are talking about is a turretless gun without armor.This thing is a armored one shotter.Have you played against and with it?I have played with it and against it.It is too OP for its BR.Think when you are playing leopard2A4 then it pens you from tuuret checks which is not possible for every tank except this OP russian bias vehicle.Are you a russian main?Because even myself as a player who plays russian is too OP for its BR and for opposing team it is not fair. Look at its armour .Please go test drive and make an armor test for leopard2a4 and m1a1 ,other NATO MBTs .It is not possible to say 'just don’t get shot '.Plus I have seen everybody who played it ,everybody even players who don’t know the weakspots was doing well because they do not need to know those because it is just point and click and enemy is dead and you can’t say that no one knows how to play.Also i think this tank shouldn’t have been added but they added ,i think it broke balance it
2 Likes
They did. And I think it’s fine where it’s at. Yes, it can lolpen just about anything. But it has a shitty reload, and I have absolutely no problem having my way with it when I encounter one, even in a Strf 9040B which hasn’t got the best penning rounds by a long shot at that BR.
1 Like
I kill like 3 - 5 every match
I can pen a leopard from the front cheek plate with most of my vehicles in that BR.
I’m a Italian main.
Really? cause most of the players using have the worst situational awareness ever (That goes for most Russian players) and from what I have seen they mostly get 2 - 3 kills a game then die and leave.
2 Likes
Problem comes from when you are against this you have to aim for weakspot.Until you aim for weakspot and shoot,you will be already dead becuase of this thing.Because this thing does not have to aim.
No, it has. Just try it on test field and shoot tanks there. Just “pointing at target” without any aiming will lead to many badly placed shots (and it will be resulted in death)
2 Likes
I didn’t know aiming for weak spots was that hard. Plus the weak spots on the Object 292 are pretty large.
You can not pen leopard turret check with any vehicle test it with 10.3 br tank
If you are saying sight cheek,i am not talking about that.What i am talking about is fully armored check.It can not be penned at10.3 BR
Give me a second, let me get you the list of vehicles that can pen it.