Obj 120 br 8? It is not fair

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
18

Giving vehicles equipment they never had isn’t “balancing the game” - it is creating War Thunderhammer.

BR, ammunitions, and rate of fire are what they use to “balance” the game.

The 120 is a derp machine, and so it is very difficult to find a sweet BR for it - too low and it is ridiculously OP in a down-tier, too high and it is useless.

But since BR is apparently based on how players perform with it, we can reasonably assume that a lot of players have done quite well with it at lower BR’s, hence it is pushed up.

2 Likes
19

Arrant nonsense and petulant whining.

You also meet tanks WITH?OUT laser rangefinders that can kill you at 1200 meters with 1 shot.

Indeed almost every tank in the game from 1.0 upwards can kill you at any range they can see you with 1 shot - and you can do the same to them :p

3 Likes
20

Yet they’re likely to have a stabilizer, faster reload speed, ATGMs, thermals, APFSDS, auto cannons and run circles around you.

1 Like
21

Most annoyingly the ready rack manipulation.

1 Like
22

Despite all that, apparently there are enough players good enough with it to warrant it being 8.0 by Gaijin’s formula.

We all get that you aren’t one of them.

23

It’s never been 8.0 before so there is no data that suggest people are good enough, and it’s stats at 7.3 are mediocre at best, and I don’t get why you have to throw petty insults like a child when we’re just talking about a virtual vehicle, apparently some people are incapable of having a discussion about something without throwing insults.

We all get you are one of them.

1 Like
24

no need.
Leo 1 is around that br and has no LRF. just learn to play it to its strengths

1 Like
25

Which is not a lot different of a situation, it’s also outclassed.

1 Like
26

exactly. and i can perform well if i know how to play a tank. no need for BR change or unrealistic buffs

27

Arrant nonsense - there is data - Gaijin has it, and we don’t.

We don’t know it’s stats.

sorry you think I made an insult. To me it is just an observation based on the evidence of your own comments.

I guess you are too then by your own logic.

28

Its unfair that that thing snipes WW2 vehicles from 1500m away with APFSDS that goes through literally everything. They have zero chance.

I hate that thing, it deserved to go up just as much as the Leopard 1.

Also it only went up 0.3 relatively because everything in that BR range went up 0.3 anyway, so in relative terms its fighting the same vehicles it would be if it was 7.7 before its BR change.

2 Likes
29

Yeah except for all the ones that don’t, at even higher BRs than the Object 120. T95E1 being one example. And that went from 8.0 to 8.3…

30

Gaijin has data on how the Object performs at 8.0 without it ever being at 8? That’s magical.
And there’s 7000 pieces of data that put the 120 at a k/d of 1.5, which is no reason for concern.

31

It gets 300mm APFSDS, this is just more about compression.

32

T95E1 has 293mm APFSDS.

33

There is. It’s called the PTZ-89 lmfao

1 Like
34

I didn’t know, looks quite interesting Indeed. Guess I will go and Grind some Social Credits as soon as I have my new IS-7 spaded.

35

PTZ89 only gets LRF (completely pointless), NVD (also completely pointless) and a stabilizer. It does have double the fire rate but the vehicle itself is naturally a downgrade since it is chinese

36

Yeah, definitely doesn’t get ERA or thermals, although thermals are useless now anyways, and with 1700m/s shell a rangefinder isn’t needed either.

37

I agree that Br 7.3 was to low but 8.0 is to high. every tank bas better mobility, better armor, faster reload, stabilizer and ammo with nearly the same pen and dont forget the LRF a lot of vehicles have on that br. i think Gajin should move it down again to at least 7.7

1 Like