Nuclear artillery isn’t really a fit for Warthunder, seems like you’re fishing for the uncounterable Call of Duty level nukes. This is not Call of Duty, nor should it EVER operate as such.
This has proved my point that you are just upset. Someone outplayed you, deal with it. It’s amazing that you could be an overwhelming force in a ground game and then still be upset because the nuke didn’t work out. Getting that many kills and still mad…
i dont even play call of duty, why do people keep throwing “this isnt COD” like wtf, dont you have better argument
not someone but gaijin, naturally nuke should spawn much higher like bomber in ARB but in GRB it spawn on AF. that’s just stupid decision. just like how they removed BUILT IN flares from nuke jaguar
No, to intercept a nuke there usually needs to be fighters already spawned and over the battlefield when the nuke sirens go off to make a successful intercept. You may have tried to spawn a slow lumbering bomber when the enemy had ample fighter cover over the battlefield, poor choice on your part. ARB isn’t the same as GRB. Fighters don’t get airspawns in ARB but do in GRB. The battlespace is much larger in ARB, and nuke planes do not exist in ARB. Differences in the modes my guy.
It’s fundamentally a victim mentality problem.
Somehow it just fits again …
I agree. I think that all planes that physically can’t take off should get an airspawn, low over airfield for ground RB and mid-altitude for air RB, and all other aircraft should take off from the airfield. I would love to see it implemented so less vehicles would be so abusable and bombers could operate a bit more nicely.
You are trying to make the nuke an uncounterable non-object, like they are in CoD. Also, before you talk to me about a “better arguement” you bettet fix your responses like this:
Discussing this with you is like trying to convince an 8 year old not to dislike something they are mad at. I provide good arguable points, and then you reply basically as “nuh-uh”.
because they only choice i had was a bad choice gaijin gave me.
if i could choose i would spawn it at 4000m instead of AF
or choose some jet instead of bomber
or use artilery nuke instead
or dont spawn it at all because my team will win anyway
or having good teammate and wait him kill all enemy plane
but no, none of them are my choice my team is losing, time is ticking.
either i dont spawn it and lose or spawn it the become a feeder then lose anyway
i get it, you that type of person that
“the game is never at fault but you”
“idk why but i will reject this guy idea will all my being”
it’s just weird people like you exist,
you could just say “+1 good” then move on
even if you reject it you can just say “no, i dont like it” then move on
dont need to give me your argument i dont need it because it’s YES or NO suggestion
but you wasted you time here rejecting the idea. really weird
i met several people like you, but unfortunately i must give up on you
YOU made the decision to spawn a nuke plane with enemy fighter cover. YOU did, and YOU died. It is YOUR fault for making BAD TACTICAL decisions.
It isn’t a good idea, and I’ve laid out exactly why already. Which is a better argument and more accurate to the situation than your awful initial post and victim mentality. Dare I even mention your attacks on other poeple for bad arguments when you say the equivilent of “nuh-uh”.
I don’t reject good idea or things that make sense. I reject stupid ideas that I think don’t fit Warthunder or would worsten the experience. This idea fits both in my eyes.
Naw nuke spawn is fine now. if anything it is a problem with Fighters and other aircraft getting an AAS (Advanced Air Spawn), when realistically them starting at the airfield at the same height and relative speed or on the runway is just fine. But that said it also should be recognized that spawning a nuke in heavy fighter cover is just a poor idea.
Plus, a nuke should not be an end all be all. Their should be the opportunity to counter if need be. I even would go as far to say that I would like to try a mechanic that makes it so if a nuke is shot down, that team should automatically loose. Key word here TRY, because I can understand how that may go poorly.
I agree for Ground RB, but as for Air RB…
I am in the group that thinks we should have airspawn for all aircraft, similar to Air AB.
nuh-uh, spawning nuke isnt bad decision but spawning it on AF is, it’s not like i had any other choice
Spawning a heavy bomber when there is heavy fighter cover is a bad idea you donut.
even if i say 9.4KM it still make sense because that was the altitude when B29 nuked japan, they werent crazy enough to drop nuke at 50 meter above ground like people does in this gaem
You couldve just not spawned the nuke in all fairness
And those B-29s had ample amount of time to reach 9.4km. How about you fly your nuke plane for hours to reach that altitude?
read
what? just move the AF spawn to air spawn? tf are you talking about
Yeah you would have lost but you clearly got shot down so lost anyway. So you could have just. not spawned it and not given someone an extra 20k SL.
or i spawn it win the game and get 15k
it’s a gamble but gaijin made it unfair
I wpuld also agree with that, but have long range/frontline bombers start at 9km, strike aircraft around 1km, and fighters somewhere in between. But that would be my idea thoughts on the numbers. Props and subsonics only though, supersonic jets and avdanced missiles would be kind of wierd with high level spawns.