And you keep using a BR known in Russian gameplay for being filled with low level players which perform on-par to at least experienced players. That should be a warning bell as to how badly the M1 performs XD
That’s great but that isn’t entirely what you said.
You specifically mentioned how in your opinion gaijin enjoys seeing US players specifically suffer, and that they have made this apparent in your opinion when they have allegedly been challenged on it.
It is clear you believe that gaijin simply has some hatred of the US or US players from your statement.
1 Like
Calm down there bud, that’s actually going against TOS
1 Like
And you keep using a BR known in Russian gameplay for being filled with low level players which perform on-par to at least experienced players.
Known? So you have some tangible evidence to prove this claim then yes?
1 Like
Have you ever looked at the player statistics while in-match? Trust me, there’s a ton of sub level 30s running a straight premium lineup
2 Likes
And you were wondering why you got banned earlier.
1 Like
OK. I’ll calm, brother, but this one especially likes to test my patience to a degree that needs to be studied for his fervor.
I’m just curious if he’s ever even tried playing a 10.3 USSR line and then tried the new 10.7 US line.
Oh, I know he hasn’t.
Put it simply, you can get 8 different main battle tanks that all carry enough firepower to be a threat and carry the fight, versus 2 M1s.
And that’s just the US vs USSR situation. We both know the other lines exemplify their own areas of expertise.
1 Like
Have you ever looked at the player statistics while in-match? Trust me, there’s a ton of sub level 30s running a straight premium lineup
So subjective anecdotal experience with no actual tangible evidence? I see plenty of all premium vehicles doing badly.
1 Like
I mean your argument is also using an unweighted and undetailed stat chart… and again, if you read what I said earlier, they are on par to players who have the experience as they had to grind through the US tech tree while EVERY OTHER NATION is doing far better, premium and non-premium. Using the statistics you keep bringing up, that there proves that the M1 is underpowered and underperforming.
Stating what the numbers are is one thing, understanding what they mean is another.
I mean your argument is also using an unweighted and undetailed stat chart
Well the exact same source was used earlier in the thread by dinfire and columbia to suggest the M1 was performing poorly. It is also the best available tangible evidence that we have available with large sample sizes. And if we are just going to discount that out of hand then the only thing we have available to us at that point is the BRs they are currently residing in based off gaijins complete statistics and balancing metrics within which the M1 is apparently performing adequately as it has not been changed or moved for a prolonged period whilst highly played.
Meanwhile you haven’t provided any evidence for performance at all aside from your subjective anecdotes. Likewise anecdotes were provided by people who do perform well with it and oppose the changes.
1 Like
Perfect example of why what he says and what he means usually are couched in stats rather than lived experience. He can’t quantify it himself because he’s never played them.
If it were simply about being OP, I’d ask them to give us M900 and not move it up in BR.
I’ve asked instead for parity with a 105mm round that nominally is the same as the rest of the now 120mm guns at this tier and BR.
3 Likes
Yes dinfire you’ve made it clear you believe your own anecdotal experience is more important than the thousands of data points in the data project and the complete set of statistics owned by gaijin and the anecdotal experience of people who disagree with you.
3 Likes
You’ve insulted me while disagreeing with me along with them, you’ll pardon if I find that sort of mockery and stupidity not worth agreeing with.
Play the tank line yourself and find out.
Or how they perform in game and the stats we have available. Do you agree that the M1 struggles far more to penetrate T-Series tanks v T-series penning M1s from the front via the information shown to you? Do you agree a majority, not all though, of the maps push frontal engagements which incline toward Soviet/Russian doctrine and negates the advantage of speed and flanking? Do you agree that the NATO doctrine is negated in this game as most maps are close range engagements and have removed a good majority of high ground advantage, either with kill zones or just completely blocked off?
1 Like
Pointing out the failings in your reasoning and pressing you with actual evidence is not “insulting” you. You doing nothing but throw out off-topic verbal insults for the last few hours, is.
2 Likes
Or how they perform in game and the stats we have available.
The statistics we have arise as a result of how they perform within the game. That is why we have them.
1 Like
Answer ww2’s questions.
Okay, go compare them to literally every other nation at around that BR then and see how the M1 is…
I have already done so, and you can too.
1 Like
Do you agree that the M1 struggles far more to penetrate T-Series tanks v T-series penning M1s from the front via the information shown to you? Do you agree a majority, not all though, of the maps push frontal engagements which incline toward Soviet/Russian doctrine and negates the advantage of speed and flanking? Do you agree that the NATO doctrine is negated in this game as most maps are close range engagements and have removed a good majority of high ground advantage, either with kill zones or just completely blocked off?